Re: I think logic is obsolete today . . . . . .
From: William Elliot (marsh_at_privacy.net)
Date: 11/22/04
- Next message: William Elliot: "Re: I think logic is obsolete today . . . . . ."
- Previous message: num num: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- In reply to: George Dance: "Re: I think logic is obsolete today . . . . . ."
- Next in thread: JusUK: "Re: I think logic is obsolete today . . . . . ."
- Reply: JusUK: "Re: I think logic is obsolete today . . . . . ."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 21:44:18 -0800
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, George Dance wrote:
> mallet_riveter@yahoo.co.in (Hans-Marc Olsen) wrote in message
>
> > We have computers and they can do all the logic stuff for us ...
>
> Once they can program and replace themselves, I suppose. But I bet
> that even then a few stick-in-the-muds will still be using their
> brains.
>
Already there's programs that produce programs, select the best of a bunch
and even discover and fix their bugs. So what, people have been learning
and replacing themselves for eons and now you're suggesting we no longer
do that naturally but let the computers have all the fun?
I can see it now, in 2050 the students finding even sex education too hard
for their media washed brains to pass, lament why do we have to learn sex
when medical labs can produce test tube babies?
Sex is obsolete, we have medical clinics,
they can do all that sex stuff for us. ;-)
- Next message: William Elliot: "Re: I think logic is obsolete today . . . . . ."
- Previous message: num num: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- In reply to: George Dance: "Re: I think logic is obsolete today . . . . . ."
- Next in thread: JusUK: "Re: I think logic is obsolete today . . . . . ."
- Reply: JusUK: "Re: I think logic is obsolete today . . . . . ."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
