Re: What do you think of this hypothetical biologist's approach? (Look at this one; ignore the previous one I've posted, since there's a typo there)
From: Frank Piron (empty_at_zero.nil)
Date: 12/02/04
- Next message: Jasper Stein: "Re: What is a proof, exactly?"
- Previous message: Jasper Stein: "Re: What is a proof, exactly?"
- In reply to: Torkel Franzen: "Re: What do you think of this hypothetical biologist's approach? (Look at this one; ignore the previous one I've posted, since there's a typo there)"
- Next in thread: Torkel Franzen: "Re: What do you think of this hypothetical biologist's approach? (Look at this one; ignore the previous one I've posted, since there's a typo there)"
- Reply: Torkel Franzen: "Re: What do you think of this hypothetical biologist's approach? (Look at this one; ignore the previous one I've posted, since there's a typo there)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 16:23:40 +0100
Am 02 Dec 2004 15:59:13 +0100 schrieb Torkel Franzen <torkel@sm.luth.se>:
> Frank Piron <empty@zero.nil> writes:
>
>> "The meaning of a word is what the explanation of the meaning
>> explains."
>>
>> * Ludwig Wittgenstein
>
> Where?
Philosophical Investigations, Paragraph 560
-- Frank Piron, defrankatkonaddot (leftrotate two)
- Next message: Jasper Stein: "Re: What is a proof, exactly?"
- Previous message: Jasper Stein: "Re: What is a proof, exactly?"
- In reply to: Torkel Franzen: "Re: What do you think of this hypothetical biologist's approach? (Look at this one; ignore the previous one I've posted, since there's a typo there)"
- Next in thread: Torkel Franzen: "Re: What do you think of this hypothetical biologist's approach? (Look at this one; ignore the previous one I've posted, since there's a typo there)"
- Reply: Torkel Franzen: "Re: What do you think of this hypothetical biologist's approach? (Look at this one; ignore the previous one I've posted, since there's a typo there)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
