Re: brief question
poopdeville_at_gmail.com
Date: 12/12/04
- Next message: |-|erc: "Re: EUREKA Cantor exposed.... sci.math curls tails between legs.."
- Previous message: |-|erc: "Re: DISPROOF OF CARDINALITY THEORY"
- In reply to: Saem T.: "brief question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 11 Dec 2004 18:14:41 -0800
I can't think of an argument off the top of my head, but Kuratowski's
Topologie has about a million different arguments about definable sets.
Maybe one of those can give you the necessary insight.
'cid 'ooh
- Next message: |-|erc: "Re: EUREKA Cantor exposed.... sci.math curls tails between legs.."
- Previous message: |-|erc: "Re: DISPROOF OF CARDINALITY THEORY"
- In reply to: Saem T.: "brief question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
