Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem
From: David C. Ullrich (ullrich_at_math.okstate.edu)
Date: 12/17/04
- Next message: mikelist: "Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed"
- Previous message: BTR1701: "Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?)"
- In reply to: Charlie-Boo: "Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem"
- Next in thread: Charlie-Boo: "Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem"
- Reply: Charlie-Boo: "Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 06:02:22 -0600
On 16 Dec 2004 07:52:02 -0800, "Charlie-Boo" <chvol@aol.com> wrote:
>[questions that have already been answered at great length,
>misconceptions that have been abundantly clarified and
>falsehoods that have been conclusively refuted snipped.]
************************
David C. Ullrich
- Next message: mikelist: "Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed"
- Previous message: BTR1701: "Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?)"
- In reply to: Charlie-Boo: "Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem"
- Next in thread: Charlie-Boo: "Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem"
- Reply: Charlie-Boo: "Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
