sci.logic
By Date

1774 messages sorted by: [ thread ]

---

Starting: 11/21/04
Ending: 12/31/04

• Re: Stupid question poopdeville_at_gmail.com (12/31/04)
• Re: Stupid question Lefty (12/31/04)
• Re: Stupid question poopdeville_at_gmail.com (12/31/04)
• Re: Stupid question poopdeville_at_gmail.com (12/31/04)
• Re: Stupid question poopdeville_at_gmail.com (12/31/04)
• Re: metamath scope Richard Fateman (12/31/04)
• Re: Shoenfield textbook namducnguyen (12/31/04)
• Re: Stupid question Acme Diagnostics (12/31/04)
• Re: Stupid question Lefty (12/31/04)
• Re: So I lied about epsilon-0 George Cox (12/31/04)
• Re: metamath scope alex goldman (12/30/04)
• Re: metamath scope Josh Purinton (12/30/04)
• Re: Shoenfield textbook Chris Menzel (12/30/04)
• Re: Definition of ordinal exponentiation Norman Megill (12/30/04)
• Re: Definition of ordinal exponentiation Norman Megill (12/30/04)
• Re: So I lied about epsilon-0 Daryl McCullough (12/30/04)
• Re: The List Problem: a pons asinorus for Cantorists george (12/30/04)
• Re: Structure and Models H. Enderton (12/30/04)
• Re: Shoenfield textbook H. Enderton (12/30/04)
• Re: So I lied about epsilon-0 H. Enderton (12/30/04)
• Re: So I lied about epsilon-0 Ross A. Finlayson (12/30/04)
• Re: Structure and Models poopdeville_at_gmail.com (12/30/04)
• Re: Structure and Models R-matrix (12/30/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Albert (12/30/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Albert (12/30/04)
• Re: AI versus Human Consciousness Albert (12/30/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" RaViNg LuNiTiC © (12/30/04)
• Re: An ordered pair with Sheffer's stroke? Tom (12/30/04)
• Re: So I lied about epsilon-0 Daryl McCullough (12/30/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Raan (12/30/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Raan (12/30/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Raan (12/30/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Raan (12/30/04)
• Re: AI versus Human Consciousness Raan (12/30/04)
• Re: FORGET ABOUT " TRUE IN A SYSTEM " Torkel Franzen (12/30/04)
• Re: FORGET ABOUT " TRUE IN A SYSTEM " Torkel Franzen (12/30/04)
• Re: FORGET ABOUT " TRUE IN A SYSTEM " examachine_at_gmail.com (12/30/04)
• Re: FORGET ABOUT " TRUE IN A SYSTEM " examachine_at_gmail.com (12/30/04)
• Re: Structure and Models David C. Ullrich (12/30/04)
• metamath scope alex goldman (12/30/04)
• Re: So I lied about epsilon-0 Chris Menzel (12/30/04)
• Re: Stupid question poopdeville_at_gmail.com (12/30/04)
• Re: So I lied about epsilon-0 Torkel Franzen (12/30/04)
• Re: So I lied about epsilon-0 Torkel Franzen (12/30/04)
• Re: Stupid question Lefty (12/30/04)
• Re: Stupid question Lefty (12/30/04)
• Re: Stupid question poopdeville_at_gmail.com (12/30/04)
• Re: Stupid question poopdeville_at_gmail.com (12/30/04)
• Re: Stupid question Lefty (12/30/04)
• Re: Stupid question Lefty (12/30/04)
• Re: Structure and Models poopdeville_at_gmail.com (12/30/04)
• Re: Stupid question Lefty (12/30/04)
• Re: So I lied about epsilon-0 Daryl McCullough (12/30/04)
• Re: Structure and Models R-matrix (12/30/04)
• Re: Stupid question Acme Diagnostics (12/30/04)
• Re: So I lied about epsilon-0 george (12/30/04)
• Re: So I lied about epsilon-0 george (12/30/04)
• Re: So I lied about epsilon-0 Daryl McCullough (12/29/04)
• Re: Structure and Models poopdeville_at_gmail.com (12/29/04)
• Structure and Models Nick (12/29/04)
• Re: So I lied about epsilon-0 H. Enderton (12/29/04)
• Re: So I lied about epsilon-0 H. Enderton (12/29/04)
• Re: Stupid question George Cox (12/29/04)
• Re: FORGET ABOUT " TRUE IN A SYSTEM " Torkel Franzen (12/29/04)
• Re: FORGET ABOUT " TRUE IN A SYSTEM " Torkel Franzen (12/29/04)
• Re: Claims fishfry (12/29/04)
• Re: Inconsistent Set Structure ? Barb Knox (12/29/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Mark Fergerson (12/29/04)
• Re: Stupid question Lefty (12/29/04)
• Re: Inconsistent Set Structure ? Barb Knox (12/29/04)
• Re: So I lied about epsilon-0 r.e.s. (12/29/04)
• Re: What's wrong with my proof? R-matrix (12/29/04)
• Re: What's wrong with my proof? R-matrix (12/29/04)
• Re: Stupid question examachine_at_gmail.com (12/29/04)
• Re: Stupid question examachine_at_gmail.com (12/29/04)
• Re: Stupid question examachine_at_gmail.com (12/29/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor examachine_at_gmail.com (12/29/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor examachine_at_gmail.com (12/29/04)
• Re: FORGET ABOUT " TRUE IN A SYSTEM " examachine_at_gmail.com (12/29/04)
• Re: FORGET ABOUT " TRUE IN A SYSTEM " examachine_at_gmail.com (12/29/04)
• Re: FORGET ABOUT " TRUE IN A SYSTEM " examachine_at_gmail.com (12/29/04)
• Re: Stupid question Lefty (12/29/04)
• Re: Cardinality: a paradox Torkel Franzen (12/29/04)
• Re: Cardinality: a paradox Daryl McCullough (12/28/04)
• Re: Cardinality: a paradox Chris Menzel (12/28/04)
• Re: Cardinality: a paradox Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (12/28/04)
• Re: So I lied about epsilon-0 Torkel Franzen (12/28/04)
• Re: So I lied about epsilon-0 KRamsay (12/28/04)
• Re: Non-r.e. relations KRamsay (12/28/04)
• Re: So I lied about epsilon-0 Torkel Franzen (12/28/04)
• Re: Cardinality: a paradox Torkel Franzen (12/28/04)
• Re: So I lied about epsilon-0 Daryl McCullough (12/28/04)
• Re: Emergence (test) Keynes (12/28/04)
• Re: Cardinality: a paradox Daryl McCullough (12/28/04)
• for the categorists and sheafifiers (was, Re: So I lied about epsilon-0) Lee Rudolph (12/28/04)
• Re: Cardinality: a paradox Chris Menzel (12/28/04)
• Re: So I lied about epsilon-0 Torkel Franzen (12/28/04)
• Re: So I lied about epsilon-0 KRamsay (12/28/04)
• Re: So I lied about epsilon-0 KRamsay (12/28/04)
• Re: Stupid question poopdeville_at_gmail.com (12/28/04)
• Re: Stupid question Peter Webb (12/28/04)
• Re: Recalling a USA president Re: can we recall Mr. Bush just as Gray Davis governor California recalled; is Parliamentary democracy superior to USA democracy Torkel Franzen (12/28/04)
• Recalling a USA president Re: can we recall Mr. Bush just as Gray Davis governor California recalled; is Parliamentary democracy superior to USA democracy Archimedes Plutonium (12/28/04)
• Re: What's wrong with my proof? R-matrix (12/28/04)
• Re: What's wrong with my proof? William Elliot (12/28/04)
• Re: Stupid question Acme Diagnostics (12/28/04)
• What's wrong with my proof? Bill Blake (12/28/04)
• Re: Stupid question poopdeville_at_gmail.com (12/28/04)
• Re: Inconsistent Set Structure ? R-matrix (12/28/04)
• Re: Inconsistent Set Structure ? R-matrix (12/28/04)
• Re: The List Problem: a pons asinorus for Cantorists tinyurl.com/uh3t (12/28/04)
• Stupid question Lefty (12/28/04)
• Re: Inconsistent Set Structure ? Stuart M Newberger (12/28/04)
• Re: Cardinality: a paradox Daryl McCullough (12/27/04)
• Re: Cardinality: a paradox Daryl McCullough (12/27/04)
• Re: Cardinality: a paradox Ron Sperber (12/27/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem David C. Ullrich (12/27/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem David C. Ullrich (12/27/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Jesse F. Hughes (12/27/04)
• Re: Inconsistent Set Structure ? R-matrix (12/27/04)
• Re: Inconsistent Set Structure ? R-matrix (12/27/04)
• Re: Inconsistent Set Structure ? Barb Knox (12/26/04)
• Re: Inconsistent Set Structure ? R-matrix (12/26/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Daryl McCullough (12/26/04)
• Re: Cardinality: a paradox John Savard (12/26/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Jesse F. Hughes (12/26/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Daryl McCullough (12/26/04)
• Re: Cardinality: a paradox Anthony Cerrato (12/26/04)
• Re: Cardinality: a paradox Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (12/26/04)
• Re: a truth atom |-|erc (12/26/04)
• Re: Cardinality: a paradox Ron Sperber (12/26/04)
• Re: Definition of ordinal exponentiation H. Enderton (12/26/04)
• Re: The Weak Points of Democracy by Archimedes Plutonium Archimedes Plutonium (12/26/04)
• Re: Inconsistent Set Structure ? Stuart M Newberger (12/26/04)
• Re: a truth atom Lefty (12/26/04)
• Re: Cardinality: a paradox Anthony Cerrato (12/26/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Anthony Cerrato (12/26/04)
• Re: a truth atom poopdeville_at_gmail.com (12/25/04)
• The Weak Points of Democracy by Archimedes Plutonium Archimedes Plutonium (12/25/04)
• can we recall Mr. Bush just as Gray Davis governor California recalled; is Parliamentary democracy superior to USA democracy Archimedes Plutonium (12/25/04)
• Re: FOL Deduction Question Zarius (12/25/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Mark Fergerson (12/25/04)
• Re: a truth atom R-matrix (12/25/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Charlie-Boo (12/25/04)
• Re: Cardinality: a paradox John Savard (12/25/04)
• Re: FOL Deduction Question Torkel Franzen (12/25/04)
• Re: FOL Deduction Question Zarius (12/25/04)
• Re: a truth atom artist formally known as |-|erc (12/25/04)
• Re: a truth atom artist formally known as |-|erc (12/25/04)
• Re: a truth atom Torkel Franzen (12/25/04)
• a truth atom artist formally known as |-|erc (12/25/04)
• Inconsistent Set Structure ? R-matrix (12/25/04)
• Re: FOL Deduction Question William Elliot (12/25/04)
• Re: FOL Deduction Question Torkel Franzen (12/25/04)
• Solution for Iraq; call for 3 strongmen to rule a Kurd, Shia, Sunni new countries and USA exits Archimedes Plutonium (12/25/04)
• Re: New Famous Proof artist formally known as |-|erc (12/25/04)
• Re: FOL Deduction Question Zarius (12/25/04)
• Re: New Famous Proof John Morrison (12/25/04)
• Re: Definition of ordinal exponentiation David Moews (12/25/04)
• INRI and last words of Jesus Re: Jesus and John-the-Baptist were rebels and not terrorists Re: Josephus was the Quelle Archimedes Plutonium (12/24/04)
• Re: Jesus and John-the-Baptist were rebels and not terrorists Re: Josephus was the Quelle Archimedes Plutonium (12/24/04)
• Re: Cardinality: a paradox Barb Knox (12/24/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem David C. Ullrich (12/24/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Charlie-Boo (12/24/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Charlie-Boo (12/24/04)
• Re: FOL Deduction Question Zarius (12/24/04)
• Re: FOL Deduction Question Torkel Franzen (12/24/04)
• Re: Definition of ordinal exponentiation David C. Ullrich (12/24/04)
• Re: So I lied about epsilon-0 Tim Peters (12/24/04)
• Re: Cardinality: a paradox John Savard (12/24/04)
• Re: So I lied about epsilon-0 Tim Peters (12/24/04)
• Re: Cardinality: a paradox Ron Sperber (12/24/04)
• Re: Non-r.e. relations LordBeotian (12/24/04)
• Re: HUMAN Brain Not Built for Logic Acme Diagnostics (12/24/04)
• Re: Cardinality: a paradox artist formally known as |-|erc (12/24/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness Skler (12/24/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. namducnguyen (12/24/04)
• Re: Jesus and John-the-Baptist were rebels and not terrorists Re: Josephus was the Quelle Archimedes Plutonium (12/24/04)
• Re: Emergence (test) Albert (12/24/04)
• Re: Cardinality: a paradox Ron Sperber (12/24/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) BTR1701 (12/24/04)
• Re: FOL Deduction Question William Elliot (12/24/04)
• Re: New Famous Proof artist formally known as |-|erc (12/24/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) JTEM (12/24/04)
• Re: Emergence (test) Albert (12/24/04)
• Re: Emergence (test) Albert (12/24/04)
• Re: Emergence (test) Sir Frederick (12/24/04)
• Re: Emergence (test) Albert (12/24/04)
• Re: Emergence (test) Acme Diagnostics (12/24/04)
• Re: Emergence (test) Albert (12/24/04)
• Re: Emergence (test) Acme Diagnostics (12/24/04)
• Re: Emergence (test) Acme Diagnostics (12/24/04)
• Re: New Famous Proof John Morrison (12/24/04)
• Re: Emergence (test) Immortalist (12/23/04)
• Re: Emergence (test) Immortalist (12/23/04)
• Re: FOL Deduction Question Zarius (12/23/04)
• Re: Emergence (test) Acme Diagnostics (12/23/04)
• Re: Emergence (test) Acme Diagnostics (12/23/04)
• FOL Deduction Question Zarius (12/23/04)
• Non-r.e. relations LordBeotian (12/23/04)
• Re: Emergence (test) Kamerynn (12/23/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) BTR1701 (12/23/04)
• Re: Emergence (test) Albert (12/23/04)
• Re: Definition of ordinal exponentiation Norman Megill (12/23/04)
• Re: Definition of ordinal exponentiation Norman Megill (12/23/04)
• Re: Emergence (test) tg (12/23/04)
• Re: Emergence (test) Hlafordlaes (12/23/04)
• Re: Emergence (test) Albert (12/23/04)
• Re: Emergence (test) addis (12/23/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. Torkel Franzen (12/23/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. namducnguyen (12/23/04)
• Re: Emergence (test) Acme Diagnostics (12/23/04)
• Re: Josephus was the Quelle for the New Testament and what the Josephus really wrote about Jesus bernard_connor_at_yahoo.co.uk (12/23/04)
• Re: So I lied about epsilon-0 george (12/23/04)
• Re: So I lied about epsilon-0 george (12/23/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" slavek krepelka (12/23/04)
• Jesus and John-the-Baptist were rebels and not terrorists Re: Josephus was the Quelle Archimedes Plutonium (12/23/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. Torkel Franzen (12/23/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. namducnguyen (12/23/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. Torkel Franzen (12/23/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. namducnguyen (12/23/04)
• Re: What is scientific method? artist formally known as |-|erc (12/23/04)
• Re: What is scientific method? Ron Sperber (12/23/04)
• Re: FORGET ABOUT " TRUE IN A SYSTEM " David Bernier (12/23/04)
• Re: mathematicians utter contempt for common sense poopdeville_at_gmail.com (12/23/04)
• Re: What is scientific method? artist formally known as |-|erc (12/23/04)
• Re: Emergence (test) Albert (12/23/04)
• Re: FORGET ABOUT " TRUE IN A SYSTEM " artist formally known as |-|erc (12/22/04)
• Re: Emergence (test) Publius (12/22/04)
• Re: Josephus was the Quelle for the New Testament and what the Josephus really wrote about Jesus Archimedes Plutonium (12/22/04)
• Re: Emergence (test) Sir Frederick (12/22/04)
• Emergence (test) Immortalist (12/22/04)
• Re: What is scientific method? Ron Sperber (12/22/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) JTEM (12/22/04)
• Re: What is scientific method? Will Twentyman (12/22/04)
• Re: What is scientific method? examachine_at_gmail.com (12/22/04)
• Re: FORGET ABOUT " TRUE IN A SYSTEM " Torkel Franzen (12/22/04)
• Re: FORGET ABOUT " TRUE IN A SYSTEM " examachine_at_gmail.com (12/22/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Mark Fergerson (12/22/04)
• Re: FORGET ABOUT " TRUE IN A SYSTEM " Torkel Franzen (12/22/04)
• Re: FORGET ABOUT " TRUE IN A SYSTEM " examachine_at_gmail.com (12/22/04)
• Re: FORGET ABOUT " TRUE IN A SYSTEM " David Bernier (12/22/04)
• Re: Definition of ordinal exponentiation David C. Ullrich (12/22/04)
• Re: FORGET ABOUT " TRUE IN A SYSTEM " poopdeville_at_gmail.com (12/22/04)
• Definition of ordinal exponentiation Norman Megill (12/22/04)
• Re: FORGET ABOUT " TRUE IN A SYSTEM " artist formally known as |-|erc (12/22/04)
• Re: FORGET ABOUT " TRUE IN A SYSTEM " artist formally known as |-|erc (12/22/04)
• Re: FORGET ABOUT " TRUE IN A SYSTEM " David Bernier (12/22/04)
• Re: FORGET ABOUT " TRUE IN A SYSTEM " Mark Nudelman (12/22/04)
• Re: Josephus was the Quelle for the New Testament and what the Josephus really wrote about Jesus bernard_connor_at_yahoo.co.uk (12/22/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) BTR1701 (12/22/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) G. Frege (12/22/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) G. Frege (12/22/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) JTEM (12/22/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) R-matrix (12/22/04)
• Re: Josephus was the Quelle for the New Testament and what the Josephusreally wrote about Jesus Archimedes Plutonium (12/22/04)
• ping Xanthian was Re: Wikipedia on "Decision Problems" artist formally known as |-|erc (12/22/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) R-matrix (12/22/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) G. Frege (12/22/04)
• Re: Josephus was the Quelle for the New Testament and what the Josephus really wrote about Jesus Barbarossa (12/22/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) G. Frege (12/22/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) G. Frege (12/22/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) G. Frege (12/22/04)
• Re: What is scientific method? artist formally known as |-|erc (12/22/04)
• Re: New Famous Proof artist formally known as |-|erc (12/22/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness Albert (12/22/04)
• Re: What is scientific method? Ron Sperber (12/22/04)
• What is scientific method? artist formally known as |-|erc (12/22/04)
• Re: logic is innate? John Morrison (12/22/04)
• Re: Basic question about modal logic and Euclidean relations Yarden Katz (12/22/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) R-matrix (12/22/04)
• Re: New Famous Proof artist formally known as |-|erc (12/22/04)
• Re: New Famous Proof Will Twentyman (12/22/04)
• Re: New Famous Proof artist formally known as |-|erc (12/22/04)
• Re: New Famous Proof John Morrison (12/22/04)
• Re: New Famous Proof Will Twentyman (12/22/04)
• Re: New Famous Proof artist formally known as |-|erc (12/22/04)
• Re: FORGET ABOUT " TRUE IN A SYSTEM " artist formally known as |-|erc (12/22/04)
• Re: New Famous Proof Will Twentyman (12/22/04)
• Re: FORGET ABOUT " TRUE IN A SYSTEM " Mark Nudelman (12/22/04)
• Re: New Famous Proof artist formally known as |-|erc (12/22/04)
• Re: Basic question about modal logic and Euclidean relations Ken Pledger (12/22/04)
• Re: New Famous Proof robert j. kolker (12/22/04)
• Re: New Famous Proof robert j. kolker (12/22/04)
• New Famous Proof artist formally known as |-|erc (12/22/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) BTR1701 (12/22/04)
• Re: Josephus was the Quelle for the New Testament and what the Josephus really wrote about Jesus Mike Oliver (12/21/04)
• Re: Basic question about modal logic and Euclidean relations Yarden Katz (12/21/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) JTEM (12/21/04)
• Basic question about modal logic and Euclidean relations Yarden Katz (12/21/04)
• Re: FORGET ABOUT " TRUE IN A SYSTEM " artist formally known as |-|erc (12/21/04)
• Josephus was the Quelle for the New Testament and what the Josephus really wrote about Jesus Archimedes Plutonium (12/21/04)
• Recursively inseparable sets Jean-Pierre MERX (12/21/04)
• Re: what boolean connectives together with -> make a complete system? Owen (12/21/04)
• Re: FORGET ABOUT " TRUE IN A SYSTEM " Barb Knox (12/21/04)
• Re: what boolean connectives together with -> make a complete system? Owen (12/21/04)
• Re: what boolean connectives together with -> make a complete system? Owen (12/21/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) G. Frege (12/21/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in Aatu Koskensilta (12/21/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in Torkel Franzen (12/21/04)
• Re: FORGET ABOUT " TRUE IN A SYSTEM " Daryl McCullough (12/21/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in Daryl McCullough (12/21/04)
• Re: FORGET ABOUT " TRUE IN A SYSTEM " John Savard (12/21/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) Torkel Franzen (12/21/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) G. Frege (12/21/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) Torkel Franzen (12/21/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) G. Frege (12/21/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) G. Frege (12/21/04)
• Re: FORGET ABOUT " TRUE IN A SYSTEM " Will Twentyman (12/21/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" slavek krepelka (12/21/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" slavek krepelka (12/21/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" slavek krepelka (12/21/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" slavek krepelka (12/21/04)
• FORGET ABOUT " TRUE IN A SYSTEM " artist formally known as |-|erc (12/21/04)
• Re: Wikipedia on "Decision Problems" artist formally known as |-|erc (12/21/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in Torkel Franzen (12/21/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) R-matrix (12/21/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) G. Frege (12/21/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) G. Frege (12/21/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) BTR1701 (12/21/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) JTEM (12/21/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) R-matrix (12/21/04)
• Re: Josephus on Jewish history and the Jesus interpolation Re: INRI, Quelle source Re: gaps in the historical Paul; Jesus a terrorist evidence Philip Deitiker (12/21/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness Skler (12/21/04)
• Re: Josephus on Jewish history and the Jesus interpolation Re: INRI, Quelle source Re: gaps in the historical Paul; Jesus a terrorist evidence deowll (12/21/04)
• Re: Josephus on Jewish history and the Jesus interpolation Re: INRI, Quelle source Re: gaps in the historical Paul; Jesus a terrorist evidence deowll (12/21/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) G. Frege (12/21/04)
• Re: proving demorgan in a limited ND G. Frege (12/21/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. Torkel Franzen (12/21/04)
• Re: Wikipedia on "Decision Problems" Chris Menzel (12/21/04)
• Re: The consise Cantor's proof ? artist formally known as |-|erc (12/20/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) G. Frege (12/20/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in Daryl McCullough (12/20/04)
• Re: The consise Cantor's proof ? David Bernier (12/20/04)
• Re: The consise Cantor's proof ? stephen_at_nomail.com (12/20/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. Aatu Koskensilta (12/20/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. Daryl McCullough (12/20/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) R-matrix (12/20/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. Torkel Franzen (12/20/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. Daryl McCullough (12/20/04)
• Re: mathematicians utter contempt for common sense zzbunker_at_netscape.net (12/20/04)
• Re: The consise Cantor's proof ? The Ghost In The Machine (12/20/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now paul (12/20/04)
• Re: so I lied about epsilon-0 Torkel Franzen (12/20/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. Torkel Franzen (12/20/04)
• Re: Wikipedia on "Decision Problems" Aatu Koskensilta (12/20/04)
• Re: what boolean connectives together with -> make a complete system? Owen (12/20/04)
• Wikipedia on "Decision Problems" David Benier (12/20/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Daryl McCullough (12/20/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem David C. Ullrich (12/20/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem David C. Ullrich (12/20/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem David C. Ullrich (12/20/04)
• Re: what boolean connectives together with -> make a complete system? artist formally known as |-|erc (12/20/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) Douglas D. Anderson (12/20/04)
• Re: The consise Cantor's proof ? artist formally known as |-|erc (12/20/04)
• Re: what boolean connectives together with -> make a complete system? G. Frege (12/20/04)
• Re: The consise Cantor's proof ? The Ghost In The Machine (12/20/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) G. Frege (12/20/04)
• Re: what boolean connectives together with -> make a complete system? Mitch Harris (12/20/04)
• Re: Josephus on Jewish history and the Jesus interpolation Re: INRI, Quelle source Re: gaps in the historical Paul; Jesus a terrorist evidence Archimedes Plutonium (12/20/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" slavek krepelka (12/20/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) R-matrix (12/20/04)
• what boolean connectives together with -> make a complete system? |-|erc (12/20/04)
• Re: mathematicians utter contempt for common sense |-|erc (12/20/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Charlie-Boo (12/20/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) BTR1701 (12/20/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Charlie-Boo (12/20/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) JTEM (12/20/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) BTR1701 (12/20/04)
• Re: So I lied about epsilon-0 Daryl McCullough (12/20/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. Daryl McCullough (12/20/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Daryl McCullough (12/20/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. george (12/20/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. george (12/20/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) |-|erc (12/20/04)
• Re: So I lied about epsilon-0 Tim Peters (12/20/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) |-|erc (12/20/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) G. Frege (12/20/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) G. Frege (12/20/04)
• so I lied about epsilon-0 george (12/20/04)
• so I lied about epsilon-0 george (12/20/04)
• Re: The consise Cantor's proof ? |-|erc (12/20/04)
• So I lied about epsilon-0 george (12/20/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) G. Frege (12/20/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Charlie-Boo (12/20/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. george (12/20/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. george (12/20/04)
• Re: The consise Cantor's proof ? The Ghost In The Machine (12/20/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. Daryl McCullough (12/20/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) G. Frege (12/20/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Daryl McCullough (12/20/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. george (12/20/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Daryl McCullough (12/20/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. Chris Menzel (12/20/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Daryl McCullough (12/20/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) |-|erc (12/20/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. george (12/20/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. george (12/20/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) JTEM (12/20/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Charlie-Boo (12/20/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Charlie-Boo (12/19/04)
• Re: The consise Cantor's proof ? |-|erc (12/19/04)
• Re: The consise Cantor's proof ? The Ghost In The Machine (12/19/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. george (12/19/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. Daryl McCullough (12/19/04)
• Re: Josephus on Jewish history and the Jesus interpolation Re: INRI, Quelle source Re: gaps in the historical Paul; Jesus a terrorist evidence Archimedes Plutonium (12/19/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. Torkel Franzen (12/19/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. george (12/19/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. george (12/19/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. Torkel Franzen (12/19/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Daryl McCullough (12/19/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. Daryl McCullough (12/19/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. Torkel Franzen (12/19/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Charlie-Boo (12/19/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. Daryl McCullough (12/19/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Daryl McCullough (12/19/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. Torkel Franzen (12/19/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem David C. Ullrich (12/19/04)
• Re: Josephus on Jewish history and the Jesus interpolation Re: INRI, Quelle source Re: gaps in the historical Paul; Jesus a terrorist evidence Archimedes Plutonium (12/19/04)
• Re: mathematicians utter contempt for common sense poopdeville_at_gmail.com (12/19/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Charlie-Boo (12/19/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. Daryl McCullough (12/19/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. Torkel Franzen (12/19/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) Barb Knox (12/19/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) Barb Knox (12/19/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) Bill Blake (12/19/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) Barb Knox (12/19/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) Barb Knox (12/19/04)
• Re: The consise Cantor's proof ? |-|erc (12/19/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) Bill Blake (12/19/04)
• Re: The consise Cantor's proof ? The Ghost In The Machine (12/19/04)
• Re: derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) Barb Knox (12/19/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Stephen Harris (12/19/04)
• derive A V (B ^ C) from (A v B) ^ (A V C) Bill Blake (12/19/04)
• mathematicians utter contempt for common sense |-|erc (12/18/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. Daryl McCullough (12/18/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Daryl McCullough (12/18/04)
• Re: The consise Cantor's proof ? |-|erc (12/18/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) BTR1701 (12/18/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Charlie-Boo (12/18/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) JTEM (12/18/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. Torkel Franzen (12/18/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. namducnguyen (12/18/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. Torkel Franzen (12/18/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Daryl McCullough (12/18/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. namducnguyen (12/18/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. namducnguyen (12/18/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness Albert (12/18/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Charlie-Boo (12/18/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now paul (12/18/04)
• Re: The consise Cantor's proof ? Daryl McCullough (12/18/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Daryl McCullough (12/18/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Charlie-Boo (12/18/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Chris Menzel (12/18/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Stephen Harris (12/18/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" slavek krepelka (12/18/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) BTR1701 (12/18/04)
• Re: The consise Cantor's proof ? |-|erc (12/18/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) JTEM (12/18/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness Skler (12/18/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness Skler (12/18/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Stephen Harris (12/18/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed Al Klein (12/17/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed Al Klein (12/17/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Stephen Harris (12/17/04)
• Re: Josephus on Jewish history and the Jesus interpolation Re: INRI, Quelle source Re: gaps in the historical Paul; Jesus a terrorist evidence Archimedes Plutonium (12/17/04)
• CFP: [TABLEAUX 2005] Call for Papers and Call for Tutorials Gernot Stenz (12/17/04)
• Re: Josephus on Jewish history and the Jesus interpolation Re: INRI, Quelle source Re: gaps in the historical Paul; Jesus a terrorist evidence Arturo Magidin (12/17/04)
• Re: Josephus on Jewish history and the Jesus interpolation Re: INRI, Quelle source Re: gaps in the historical Paul; Jesus a terrorist evidence Martyn Harrison (12/17/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" slavek krepelka (12/17/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Chris Menzel (12/17/04)
• Re: proving demorgan in a limited ND G. Frege (12/17/04)
• Re: proving demorgan in a limited ND G. Frege (12/17/04)
• Re: proving demorgan in a limited ND G. Frege (12/17/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed Christopher A. Lee (12/17/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed mikelist (12/17/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed Christopher A. Lee (12/17/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed mikelist (12/17/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem David C. Ullrich (12/17/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) BTR1701 (12/17/04)
• Re: Josephus on Jewish history and the Jesus interpolation Re: INRI, Quelle source Re: gaps in the historical Paul; Jesus a terrorist evidence Martyn Harrison (12/17/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness slavek krepelka (12/17/04)
• Re: proving demorgan in a limited ND William Elliot (12/17/04)
• Re: proving demorgan in a limited ND Barb Knox (12/17/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" slavek krepelka (12/17/04)
• Re: proving demorgan in a limited ND yarden.katz_at_gmail.com (12/17/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness Albert (12/17/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) JTEM (12/17/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness Skler (12/17/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence GP of ATJ (12/17/04)
• Re: logic is innate? Stephen Harris (12/17/04)
• Re: proving demorgan in a limited ND Barb Knox (12/16/04)
• Re: proving demorgan in a limited ND yarden.katz_at_gmail.com (12/16/04)
• Re: proving demorgan in a limited ND Barb Knox (12/16/04)
• Re: proving demorgan in a limited ND yarden.katz_at_gmail.com (12/16/04)
• Re: proving demorgan in a limited ND George Cox (12/16/04)
• Re: proving demorgan in a limited ND Barb Knox (12/16/04)
• Re: The consise Cantor's proof ? george (12/16/04)
• Re: proving demorgan in a limited ND Barb Knox (12/16/04)
• Re: Josephus on Jewish history and the Jesus interpolation Re: INRI, Quelle source Re: gaps in the historical Paul; Jesus a terrorist evidence Philip Deitiker (12/16/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence Mel (12/16/04)
• proving demorgan in a limited ND yarden.katz_at_gmail.com (12/16/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Charlie-Boo (12/16/04)
• Re: The consise Cantor's proof ? rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com (12/16/04)
• Re: The consise Cantor's proof ? |-|erc (12/16/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness June R Harton (12/16/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind george (12/16/04)
• Re: The consise Cantor's proof ? george (12/16/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind george (12/16/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Stephen Harris (12/16/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Stephen Harris (12/16/04)
• functional completeness as a logical operation nsprakel_at_hotmail.com (12/16/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Stephen Harris (12/16/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" |-|erc (12/16/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" |-|erc (12/16/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Chris Menzel (12/15/04)
• Re: simple induction Josh Purinton (12/15/04)
• Re: simple induction poopdeville_at_gmail.com (12/15/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Truth (12/15/04)
• Re: simple induction Josh Purinton (12/15/04)
• simple induction yarden.katz_at_gmail.com (12/15/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Albert (12/15/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Albert (12/15/04)
• Re: An ordered pair with Sheffer's stroke? Tom (12/15/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" The Ghost In The Machine (12/15/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" |-|erc (12/15/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Albert (12/15/04)
• Re: An ordered pair with Sheffer's stroke? Barb Knox (12/15/04)
• Re: An ordered pair with Sheffer's stroke? Tom (12/15/04)
• Re: An ordered pair with Sheffer's stroke? Tom (12/15/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) BTR1701 (12/15/04)
• Re: Josephus on Jewish history and the Jesus interpolation Re: INRI, Quelle source Re: gaps in the historical Paul; Jesus a terrorist evidence |-|erc (12/15/04)
• Re: Josephus on Jewish history and the Jesus interpolation Re: INRI, Quelle source Re: gaps in the historical Paul; Jesus a terrorist evidence Archimedes Plutonium (12/15/04)
• Re: An ordered pair with Sheffer's stroke? William Elliot (12/15/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Truth (12/15/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting Ass (12/15/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting Ass (12/15/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Truth (12/15/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Truth (12/15/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Truth (12/15/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Truth (12/15/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Truth (12/15/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Truth (12/15/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness Truth (12/15/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) JTEM (12/15/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Albert (12/15/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) BTR1701 (12/15/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" |-|erc (12/15/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting Ass (12/15/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" |-|erc (12/15/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) BTR1701 (12/15/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 37: I just realized what's wrong with the Continuum Hypothesis george (12/15/04)
• Re: An ordered pair with Sheffer's stroke? Barb Knox (12/14/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence GP of ATJ (12/14/04)
• When aliens contact us, the religion measuring rod is 7 Nov and 14 Dec Archimedes Plutonium (12/14/04)
• Only two holidays for God, Lord Almighty-- Nov 7 and Dec 14; Dec14 Sermon Archimedes Plutonium (12/14/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) JTEM (12/14/04)
• Re: An ordered pair with Sheffer's stroke? Tom (12/14/04)
• Re: An ordered pair with Sheffer's stroke? Tom (12/14/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Anthony Cerrato (12/14/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) BTR1701 (12/14/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem David C. Ullrich (12/14/04)
• Re: Stack Overflow gswork_at_mailcity.com (12/14/04)
• Re: An ordered pair with Sheffer's stroke? Barb Knox (12/14/04)
• Re: What happens if I sell my brain on ebay ? ? ? ? ? timm_at_amsta.leeds.ac.uk (12/14/04)
• Josephus on Jewish history and the Jesus interpolation Re: INRI, Quelle source Re: gaps in the historical Paul; Jesus a terrorist evidence Archimedes Plutonium (12/14/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting Ass (12/14/04)
• Re: An ordered pair with Sheffer's stroke? William Elliot (12/14/04)
• Re: An ordered pair with Sheffer's stroke? William Elliot (12/14/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) BTR1701 (12/14/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting Ass (12/14/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Albert (12/14/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) BTR1701 (12/14/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Albert (12/14/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Albert (12/14/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Albert (12/14/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" |-|erc (12/14/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) JTEM (12/14/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) BTR1701 (12/14/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" |-|erc (12/14/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" RaViNg LuNiTiC © (12/13/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" |-|erc (12/13/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 37: I just realized what's wrong with the Continuum Hypothesis rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com (12/13/04)
• Re: An ordered pair with Sheffer's stroke? Anders Goeransson (12/13/04)
• Re: An ordered pair with Sheffer's stroke? Barb Knox (12/13/04)
• Re: What happens if I sell my brain on ebay ? ? ? ? ? Will Twentyman (12/13/04)
• Re: Nerd Quotient Quiz Jonathan Kirwan (12/13/04)
• Deep Thoughts # 37: I just realized what's wrong with the Continuum Hypothesis Charlie-Boo (12/13/04)
• Nicod's system H. Enderton (12/13/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now paul (12/13/04)
• Re: An ordered pair with Sheffer's stroke? Tom (12/13/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Ross A. Finlayson (12/13/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Chris Menzel (12/13/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Chris Menzel (12/13/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Mark Fergerson (12/13/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Albert (12/13/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Owen (12/13/04)
• On Selfcontained Systems Charlie-Boo (12/13/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now paul (12/13/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Chris Menzel (12/13/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Daryl McCullough (12/13/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Stephen Harris (12/13/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" kati sinenmaa (12/13/04)
• Re: The extent of the mistake |-|erc (12/13/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Stephen Harris (12/13/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Albert (12/13/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now paul (12/13/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Stephen Harris (12/13/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Owen (12/13/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" |-|erc (12/13/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Chris Menzel (12/13/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Charlie-Boo (12/13/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Ross A. Finlayson (12/13/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Chris Menzel (12/13/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Ross A. Finlayson (12/13/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Chris Menzel (12/13/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Stephen Harris (12/13/04)
• Re: logic is innate? Mitch Harris (12/13/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Palle R Jensen (12/13/04)
• Re: The extent of the mistake Barb Knox (12/13/04)
• Re: An ordered pair with Sheffer's stroke? William Elliot (12/13/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" |-|erc (12/13/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting Ass (12/13/04)
• Re: The extent of the mistake poopdeville_at_gmail.com (12/13/04)
• Re: INRI, Quelle source Re: gaps in the historical Paul; Jesus a terrorist evidence Archimedes Plutonium (12/13/04)
• INRI, Quelle source Re: gaps in the historical Paul; Jesus a terrorist evidence Archimedes Plutonium (12/13/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Albert (12/13/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence GP of ATJ (12/13/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence GP of ATJ (12/13/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) BTR1701 (12/13/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Albert (12/13/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting Ass (12/13/04)
• Re: DISPROOF OF CARDINALITY THEORY |-|erc (12/13/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" |-|erc (12/13/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Stephen Harris (12/13/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Stephen Harris (12/13/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) Douglas D. Anderson (12/13/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) BTR1701 (12/13/04)
• The consise Cantor's proof ? |-|erc (12/12/04)
• Re: DISPROOF OF CARDINALITY THEORY |-|erc (12/12/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" |-|erc (12/12/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" |-|erc (12/12/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Albert (12/12/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Anthony Cerrato (12/12/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting Ass (12/12/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now paul (12/12/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence GP of ATJ (12/12/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Stephen Harris (12/12/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence Douglas D. Anderson (12/12/04)
• Re: An ordered pair with Sheffer's stroke? Tom (12/12/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" The Sophist (12/12/04)
• Re: Induction, Kant, Infinity Ross A. Finlayson (12/12/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence Zoogar, ruler of the Zerg (12/12/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Chris Menzel (12/12/04)
• Re: EUREKA Cantor exposed.... sci.math curls tails between legs.. The Ghost In The Machine (12/12/04)
• Re: DISPROOF OF CARDINALITY THEORY The Ghost In The Machine (12/12/04)
• Re: Primitive recursive sets Torkel Franzen (12/12/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence Tatu Portin (12/12/04)
• Re: What happens if I sell my brain on ebay ? ? ? ? ? |-|erc (12/12/04)
• What happens if I sell my brain on ebay ? ? ? ? ? Bruno Beam (12/12/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" |-|erc (12/12/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Stephen Harris (12/12/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Stephen Harris (12/12/04)
• Primitive recursive sets Jean-Pierre MERX (12/12/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Chris Menzel (12/12/04)
• Re: EUREKA Cantor exposed.... sci.math curls tails between legs.. |-|erc (12/12/04)
• Re: EUREKA Cantor exposed.... sci.math curls tails between legs.. Kent Paul Dolan (12/12/04)
• Re: EUREKA Cantor exposed.... sci.math curls tails between legs.. |-|erc (12/12/04)
• Re: EUREKA Cantor exposed.... sci.math curls tails between legs.. Jesse F. Hughes (12/12/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now paul (12/12/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) BTR1701 (12/12/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence Zoogar, ruler of the Zerg (12/12/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence Larry Huntley (12/12/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" |-|erc (12/12/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting Ass (12/12/04)
• Re: An ordered pair with Sheffer's stroke? William Elliot (12/12/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Anthony Cerrato (12/12/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence Frank Dwyer (12/12/04)
• Re: DISPROOF OF CARDINALITY THEORY |-|erc (12/12/04)
• Re: DISPROOF OF CARDINALITY THEORY The Ghost In The Machine (12/12/04)
• Re: Question about Ad Hominem Stephen Harris (12/12/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) BTR1701 (12/12/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence Ćrchie (12/12/04)
• Re: Nerd Quotient Quiz Tim K. (12/12/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence Douglas D. Anderson (12/12/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Stephen Harris (12/12/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence Ćrchie (12/12/04)
• Re: EUREKA Cantor exposed.... sci.math curls tails between legs.. |-|erc (12/12/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting Ass (12/12/04)
• Re: brief question poopdeville_at_gmail.com (12/12/04)
• Re: DISPROOF OF CARDINALITY THEORY |-|erc (12/12/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy) (12/12/04)
• Re: Stack Overflow AngleWyrm (12/12/04)
• DISPROOF OF CARDINALITY THEORY |-|erc (12/12/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) BTR1701 (12/12/04)
• Re: Stack Overflow Holly (12/11/04)
• Re: EUREKA Cantor exposed.... sci.math curls tails between legs.. |-|erc (12/11/04)
• Re: EUREKA Cantor exposed.... sci.math curls tails between legs.. |-|erc (12/11/04)
• Re: Stack Overflow Keynes (12/11/04)
• Re: EUREKA Cantor exposed.... sci.math curls tails between legs.. Kent Paul Dolan (12/11/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting Ass (12/11/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence Zoogar, ruler of the Zerg (12/11/04)
• Re: EUREKA Cantor exposed.... sci.math curls tails between legs.. george (12/11/04)
• Re: Consciousness "Hard Problem" Mark Fergerson (12/11/04)
• Re: EUREKA Cantor exposed.... sci.math curls tails between legs.. Mark Nudelman (12/11/04)
• brief question Saem T. (12/11/04)
• Re: An ordered pair with Sheffer's stroke? Tom (12/11/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence Ćrchie (12/11/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence Douglas D. Anderson (12/11/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence Frank Dwyer (12/11/04)
• Re: Induction, Kant, Infinity Ross A. Finlayson (12/11/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence Matt Giwer (12/11/04)
• Re: The extent of the mistake |-|erc (12/11/04)
• Re: Induction, Kant, Infinity Chris Menzel (12/11/04)
• Re: EUREKA Cantor exposed.... sci.math curls tails between legs.. |-|erc (12/11/04)
• Re: More on the Continuum Hypothesis Torkel Franzen (12/11/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now paul (12/11/04)
• Re: EUREKA Cantor exposed.... sci.math curls tails between legs.. The Ghost In The Machine (12/11/04)
• Re: AI versus Human Consciousness Anthony Cerrato (12/11/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) BTR1701 (12/11/04)
• Re: EUREKA Cantor exposed.... sci.math curls tails between legs.. Daryl McCullough (12/11/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence Vic Sagerquist (12/11/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness Peter F (12/11/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting Ass (12/11/04)
• Re: Induction, Kant, Infinity Ross A. Finlayson (12/11/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence Bill (12/11/04)
• Re: EUREKA Cantor exposed.... sci.math curls tails between legs.. |-|erc (12/11/04)
• Re: EUREKA Cantor exposed.... sci.math curls tails between legs.. Mark Nudelman (12/11/04)
• Re: EUREKA Cantor exposed.... sci.math curls tails between legs.. Kent Paul Dolan (12/11/04)
• Re: The extent of the mistake Lefty (12/11/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? |-|erc (12/11/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? |-|erc (12/11/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) BTR1701 (12/10/04)
• The extent of the mistake John Jones (12/10/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion |-|erc (12/10/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion |-|erc (12/10/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion |-|erc (12/10/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence Mel (12/10/04)
• Re: EUREKA Cantor exposed.... sci.math curls tails between legs.. |-|erc (12/10/04)
• Re: EUREKA Cantor exposed.... sci.math curls tails between legs.. |-|erc (12/10/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion Torkel Franzen (12/10/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion George Greene (12/10/04)
• Re: EUREKA Cantor exposed.... sci.math curls tails between legs.. George Greene (12/10/04)
• Re: An ordered pair with Sheffer's stroke? George Greene (12/10/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence Hagar (12/10/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion George Greene (12/10/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion George Greene (12/10/04)
• Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence George (12/10/04)
• Re: EUREKA Cantor exposed.... sci.math curls tails between legs.. Jesse F. Hughes (12/10/04)
• Re: EUREKA Cantor exposed.... sci.math curls tails between legs.. Daryl McCullough (12/10/04)
• Re: EUREKA Cantor exposed.... sci.math curls tails between legs.. Jesse F. Hughes (12/10/04)
• Re: EUREKA Cantor exposed.... sci.math curls tails between legs.. Daryl McCullough (12/10/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting Ass (12/10/04)
• Re: EUREKA Cantor exposed.... sci.math curls tails between legs.. The Ghost In The Machine (12/10/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence Ćrchie (12/10/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Owen (12/10/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence Somewriter (12/10/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind google-noreply.a.jp_at_xoxy.net (12/10/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence GP of ATJ (12/10/04)
• Re: An ordered pair with Sheffer's stroke? William Elliot (12/10/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence Mel (12/10/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? wbarwell (12/10/04)
• Re: NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) BTR1701 (12/10/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? wbarwell (12/10/04)
• Re: An ordered pair with Sheffer's stroke? Tom (12/10/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. george (12/10/04)
• Re: An ordered pair with Sheffer's stroke? george (12/10/04)
• EUREKA Cantor exposed.... sci.math curls tails between legs.. |-|erc (12/10/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence Ray Fischer (12/10/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy) (12/10/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion |-|erc (12/10/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? |-|erc (12/10/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion Daryl McCullough (12/10/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence Neil Kelsey (12/10/04)
• Re: Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence Tatu Portin (12/10/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? Ogie Oglethorpe (12/10/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? raven1 (12/10/04)
• NeoCon Christian Textbook: Blacks "Liked" Slavery (Who's More Moral, Liberal Atheist or Christian Conservatives?) Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting Ass (12/10/04)
• Why Do Neocons Think Rape Is Okay? Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting Ass (12/10/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Stephen Harris (12/10/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? |-|erc (12/10/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion |-|erc (12/10/04)
• Famous Atheist Now Believes in God Based on Scientific Evidence Gactimus (12/10/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? |-|erc (12/10/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? raven1 (12/10/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion george (12/10/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now paul (12/10/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? |-|erc (12/10/04)
• Re: An ordered pair with Sheffer's stroke? H. Enderton (12/10/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion george (12/10/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? raven1 (12/10/04)
• Re: Induction, Kant, Infinity george (12/10/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? |-|erc (12/10/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? Cardinal Chunder (12/09/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? Cardinal Chunder (12/09/04)
• Re: Induction, Kant, Infinity george (12/09/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Stephen Harris (12/09/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? raven1 (12/09/04)
• Re: More on the Continuum Hypothesis george (12/09/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? unrestrained_hand_at_hotmail.com (12/09/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? unrestrained_hand_at_hotmail.com (12/09/04)
• Re: An ordered pair with Sheffer's stroke? Barb Knox (12/09/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? |-|erc (12/09/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? Randy Poe (12/09/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? Johnny Bravo (12/09/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? Johnny Bravo (12/09/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? jwk (12/09/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Chris Menzel (12/09/04)
• An ordered pair with Sheffer's stroke? Tom (12/09/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? Cardinal Chunder (12/09/04)
• More on the Continuum Hypothesis Charlie-Boo (12/09/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? |-|erc (12/09/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? Ogie Oglethorpe (12/09/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Stephen Harris (12/09/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? |-|erc (12/09/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor; nonstandard "numbers" in ZF Chris Menzel (12/09/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? |-|erc (12/09/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Stephen Harris (12/09/04)
• Induction, Kant, Infinity Ross A. Finlayson (12/09/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Stephen Harris (12/09/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? raven1 (12/09/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Stephen Harris (12/09/04)
• Re: An ordered pair with Sheffer's stroke? William Elliot (12/09/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? |-|erc (12/09/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? raven1 (12/09/04)
• Re: gaps in the historical Paul; Jesus a terrorist evidence Archimedes Plutonium (12/09/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Stephen Harris (12/09/04)
• Re: gaps in the historical Paul; Jesus a terrorist evidence |-|erc (12/09/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Stephen Harris (12/09/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion |-|erc (12/09/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion Kenneth Doyle (12/09/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion Kenneth Doyle (12/08/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion |-|erc (12/08/04)
• Re: An ordered pair with Sheffer's stroke? Barb Knox (12/08/04)
• Re: An ordered pair with Sheffer's stroke? Barb Knox (12/08/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? |-|erc (12/08/04)
• Re: gaps in the historical Paul; Jesus a terrorist evidence |-|erc (12/08/04)
• Re: gaps in the historical Paul; Jesus a terrorist evidence Archimedes Plutonium (12/08/04)
• Re: gaps in the historical Paul; Jesus a terrorist evidence Archimedes Plutonium (12/08/04)
• Re: Stack Overflow Programmer Dude (12/08/04)
• Re: Stack Overflow Programmer Dude (12/08/04)
• Re: gaps in the historical Paul; Jesus a terrorist evidence bernard_connor_at_yahoo.co.uk (12/08/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor timm_at_amsta.leeds.ac.uk (12/08/04)
• An ordered pair with Sheffer's stroke? Tom (12/08/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now paul (12/08/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? stoney (12/08/04)
• Re: logic is innate? ernobe (12/08/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion |-|erc (12/08/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion |-|erc (12/08/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion Kenneth Doyle (12/08/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion |-|erc (12/08/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion Kenneth Doyle (12/08/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion |-|erc (12/08/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion Kenneth Doyle (12/08/04)
• Re: gaps in the historical Paul; Jesus a terrorist evidence |-|erc (12/08/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Chris Menzel (12/08/04)
• Re: given a context free grammar G and a DFA M Mitch Harris (12/08/04)
• Re: gaps in the historical Paul; Jesus a terrorist evidence zolota (12/08/04)
• gaps in the historical Paul; Jesus a terrorist evidence Archimedes Plutonium (12/08/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now G. Frege (12/08/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion Rob Duncan (12/08/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion HERC777 (12/08/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Stephen Harris (12/07/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion Daryl McCullough (12/07/04)
• Re: Lambda calculus numerals book recommendation? HERC777 (12/07/04)
• Re: Lambda calculus numerals book recommendation? HERC777 (12/07/04)
• Re: Lambda calculus numerals book recommendation? HERC777 (12/07/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion HERC777 (12/07/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness David Thomson (12/07/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. Torkel Franzen (12/07/04)
• given a context free grammar G and a DFA M adsl (12/07/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem chvol_at_aol.com (12/07/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion dastard_at_my-deja.com (12/07/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion dastard_at_my-deja.com (12/07/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Stephen Harris (12/07/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Stephen Harris (12/07/04)
• Re: How to prove: Aleph0==c ;-) Andreas Grois (12/07/04)
• Re: Lambda calculus numerals book recommendation? H. J. Sander Bruggink (12/07/04)
• Re: Lambda calculus numerals book recommendation? Andrea Schalk (12/07/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? HERC777 (12/07/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Owen (12/07/04)
• Re: quantifier eliminations timm_at_amsta.leeds.ac.uk (12/07/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion HERC777 (12/07/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion george (12/07/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion george (12/07/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor george (12/07/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. george (12/07/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. george (12/07/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor george (12/07/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor george (12/07/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Ross A. Finlayson (12/07/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? Christopher A. Lee (12/07/04)
• Re: Lambda calculus numerals book recommendation? HERC777 (12/07/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now paul (12/07/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Barb Knox (12/07/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed Christopher A. Lee (12/07/04)
• Re: Stack Overflow ernobe (12/07/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Stephen Harris (12/07/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Owen (12/06/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Ross A. Finlayson (12/06/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now paul (12/06/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Chris Menzel (12/06/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now paul (12/06/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now robert j. kolker (12/06/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now paul (12/06/04)
• Re: "probability functions" to expansions of R Ross A. Finlayson (12/06/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now robert j. kolker (12/06/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now The Sophist (12/06/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now George Cox (12/06/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. Torkel Franzen (12/06/04)
• "probability functions" to expansions of R Tim Mellor (12/06/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. namducnguyen (12/06/04)
• Re: logic is innate? Herman Jurjus (12/06/04)
• Re: Lambda calculus numerals book recommendation? H. J. Sander Bruggink (12/06/04)
• Re: HUMAN Brain Not Built for Logic Acme Diagnostics (12/06/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? HERC777 (12/06/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? HERC777 (12/06/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Barb Knox (12/06/04)
• re: Question about Ad Hominem Acme Diagnostics (12/06/04)
• What is a proof, exactly? (Stupid google) Acid Pooh (12/06/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Ross A. Finlayson (12/06/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Ross A. Finlayson (12/06/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. Torkel Franzen (12/06/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now paul (12/06/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Chris Menzel (12/06/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness David Thomson (12/06/04)
• Re: How to prove: Aleph0==c ;-) Barb Knox (12/06/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Chris Menzel (12/06/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now The Sophist (12/06/04)
• Lambda calculus numerals book recommendation? Snis Pilbor (12/06/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. namducnguyen (12/06/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? HERC777 (12/05/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? Richard Henry (12/05/04)
• Re: quantifier eliminations Saem T. (12/05/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Virgil (12/05/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now George Cox (12/05/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed Billy Goat (12/05/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Mitch Harris (12/05/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Stephen Harris (12/05/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Chris Menzel (12/05/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? John Baker (12/05/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now Owen (12/05/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Josh Purinton (12/05/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? raven1 (12/05/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? JessHC (12/05/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? JessHC (12/05/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? JessHC (12/05/04)
• Re: Tautologies Then and Now George Cox (12/05/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? raven1 (12/05/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? raven1 (12/05/04)
• Question about Ad Hominem WPraeder (12/05/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? Enkidu (12/05/04)
• Re: quantifier eliminations Tim Mellor (12/05/04)
• Re: Does a "pure" real valued probability function mak Ross A. Finlayson (12/05/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? HERC777 (12/05/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Eray Ozkural exa (12/05/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? Cardinal Chunder (12/05/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? HERC777 (12/05/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? HERC777 (12/05/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? Cardinal Chunder (12/05/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? HERC777 (12/05/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? raven1 (12/05/04)
• Re: logic is innate? Acid Pooh (12/05/04)
• Re: Does a "pure" real valued probability function mak Ross A. Finlayson (12/05/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed Denis Loubet (12/05/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness Paul Holbach (12/05/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor HERC777 (12/05/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Barb Knox (12/05/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? Enkidu (12/05/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed Aratzio (12/05/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? Don Kresch (12/05/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion. HERC777 (12/05/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? HERC777 (12/05/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor HERC777 (12/05/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? Richard Henry (12/05/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor George Greene (12/05/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed bluskie (12/05/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? raven1 (12/05/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? Enkidu (12/05/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? Don Kresch (12/05/04)
• Re: the problem with skeptics inc. Jacques Guy (12/04/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion HERC777 (12/04/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? ZZBunker (12/04/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? raven1 (12/04/04)
• Re: need help in understanding Torkel's ZFC comment Chairman of the David Hilbert Appreciation Society (12/04/04)
• quantifier eliminations Saem T. (12/04/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? Uncle Al (12/04/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion Uncle Al (12/04/04)
• Re: What guarantee do we have of scientific method? Mark K. Bilbo (12/04/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion. Ross A. Finlayson (12/04/04)
• Re: need help in understanding Torkel's ZFC comment Charlie-Boo (12/04/04)
• Re: the problem with skeptics inc. George (12/04/04)
• What guarantee do we have of scientific method? HERC777 (12/04/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion. HERC777 (12/04/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion HERC777 (12/04/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion Uncle Al (12/04/04)
• No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion HERC777 (12/04/04)
• Re: need help in understanding Torkel's ZFC comment Chairman of the David Hilbert Appreciation Society (12/04/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion. Uncle Al (12/04/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor HERC777 (12/04/04)
• UCLA Logic Colloquium, Dec 10 H. Enderton (12/04/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed Billy Goat (12/03/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Daryl McCullough (12/03/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Poker Joker (12/03/04)
• Re: the problem with skeptics inc. George (12/03/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion. HERC777 (12/03/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion. Ross A. Finlayson (12/03/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion. HERC777 (12/03/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Charlie-Boo (12/03/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Charlie-Boo (12/03/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Charlie-Boo (12/03/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Jesse F. Hughes (12/03/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Chris Menzel (12/03/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Eray Ozkural exa (12/03/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Virgil (12/03/04)
• Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion. Uncle Al (12/03/04)
• Re: the problem with skeptics inc. Cardinal Chunder (12/03/04)
• Re: Study: Stem Cell Therapy 100% More Effective Than Jesus Gactimus (12/03/04)
• Re: Study: Stem Cell Therapy 100% More Effective Than Jesus Gactimus (12/03/04)
• Re: need help in understanding Torkel's ZFC comment Charlie-Boo (12/03/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Daryl McCullough (12/03/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Daryl McCullough (12/03/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Charlie-Boo (12/03/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Charlie-Boo (12/03/04)
• Re: logic is innate? Herman Jurjus (12/03/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Daryl McCullough (12/03/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Jasper Stein (12/03/04)
• Re: Does a "pure" real valued probability function mak Ross A. Finlayson (12/03/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Jesse F. Hughes (12/03/04)
• the problem with skeptics inc. HERC777 (12/03/04)
• No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion. HERC777 (12/03/04)
• Re: logic is innate? Jesse F. Hughes (12/03/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Virgil (12/03/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Virgil (12/03/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Chas Brown (12/03/04)
• Possible Awesome Proof of the Lusin-Purves Theorem Acid Pooh (12/03/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness Paul Holbach (12/03/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Josh Purinton (12/03/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Josh Purinton (12/03/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Josh Purinton (12/03/04)
• Re: logic is innate? Acid Pooh (12/03/04)
• Re: Perception and Physics Lefty (12/03/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Poker Joker (12/03/04)
• Re: What do you think of this hypothetical biologist's approach? (Look at this one; ignore the previous one I've posted, since there's a typo there) Lefty (12/03/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Poker Joker (12/03/04)
• Re: I came here to babble incoherently about and the universe. Lefty (12/03/04)
• Re: What do you think of this hypothetical biologist's approach? (Look at this one; ignore the previous one I've posted, since there's a typo there) Torkel Franzen (12/03/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Eray Ozkural exa (12/03/04)
• Re: I came here to babble incoherently about and the universe. Lefty (12/03/04)
• Re: Infinite number of football teams HERC777 (12/02/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Daryl McCullough (12/02/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed Aratzio (12/02/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Luis A. Rodriguez (12/02/04)
• Universal sentences of Z and ZxZ Jean-Pierre MERX (12/02/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed bluskie (12/02/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed bluskie (12/02/04)
• Re: What do you think of this hypothetical biologist's approach? (Look at this one; ignore the previous one I've posted, since there's a typo there) Daryl McCullough (12/02/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Ross A. Finlayson (12/02/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed Leonard Blackburn (12/02/04)
• Re: Does a "pure" real valued probability function mak Leonard Blackburn (12/02/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed George (12/02/04)
• Re: Study: Stem Cell Therapy 100% More Effective Than Jesus Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting Ass (12/02/04)
• Re: What do you think of this hypothetical biologist's approach? (Look at this one; ignore the previous one I've posted, since there's a typo there) Will Twentyman (12/02/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Jesse F. Hughes (12/02/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Jasper Stein (12/02/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Mike Oliver (12/02/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Mike Oliver (12/02/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Jasper Stein (12/02/04)
• Re: What do you think of this hypothetical biologist's approach? (Look at this one; ignore the previous one I've posted, since there's a typo there) Frank Piron (12/02/04)
• Re: What do you think of this hypothetical biologist's approach? (Look at this one; ignore the previous one I've posted, since there's a typo there) Torkel Franzen (12/02/04)
• Re: Does a "pure" real valued probability function mak timm_at_amsta.leeds.ac.uk (12/02/04)
• Re: What do you think of this hypothetical biologist's approach? (Look at this one; ignore the previous one I've posted, since there's a typo there) Frank Piron (12/02/04)
• Re: What do you think of this hypothetical biologist's approach? (Look at this one; ignore the previous one I've posted, since there's a typo there) timm_at_amsta.leeds.ac.uk (12/02/04)
• Re: Study: Stem Cell Therapy 100% More Effective Than Jesus Iain (12/02/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Jasper Stein (12/02/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed Ph˙ltęr (12/02/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Anders Goeransson (12/02/04)
• Re: logic is innate? Jesse F. Hughes (12/02/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Torkel Franzen (12/02/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Frank Piron (12/02/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Helene.Boucher_at_wanadoo.fr (12/02/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Torkel Franzen (12/02/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Frank Piron (12/02/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Torkel Franzen (12/02/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Frank Piron (12/02/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor george (12/02/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor george (12/02/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Torkel Franzen (12/02/04)
• Re: Study: Stem Cell Therapy 100% More Effective Than Jesus Gactimus (12/02/04)
• Re: Study: Stem Cell Therapy 100% More Effective Than Jesus Steve Hayes (12/02/04)
• Re: Study: Stem Cell Therapy 100% More Effective Than Jesus Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting Ass (12/02/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Frank Piron (12/02/04)
• Re: Anybody else get Virus"W32.Beagle.AV@mm" from Muslim-hating Robert Kolker? john_correy_at_yahoo.com (12/02/04)
• Re: I came here to babble incoherently about and the universe. Lefty (12/02/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Eray Ozkural exa (12/02/04)
• What do you think of this hypothetical biologist's approach? (Look at this one; ignore the previous one I've posted, since there's a typo there) Raymond (12/02/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed nJb (12/02/04)
• What sort of problem is there in this hypothetical biologist's approach? Raymond (12/02/04)
• Re: Study: Stem Cell Therapy 100% More Effective Than Jesus ođin (12/02/04)
• Re: Study: Stem Cell Therapy 100% More Effective Than Jesus Steve Hayes (12/02/04)
• Re: logic is innate? Acid Pooh (12/02/04)
• Re: Is (x)(y)Rxy Symmetric? R-matrix (12/01/04)
• Re: Stack Overflow Chris Thomson (12/01/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Ross A. Finlayson (12/01/04)
• Re: Stack Overflow Chris Thomson (12/01/04)
• Re: Study: Stem Cell Therapy 100% More Effective Than Jesus quibbler (12/01/04)
• Re: Does a "pure" real valued probability function mak George Cox (12/01/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Andrew Boucher (12/01/04)
• Re: Study: Stem Cell Therapy 100% More Effective Than Jesus ođin (12/01/04)
• Re: Study: Stem Cell Therapy 100% More Effective Than Jesus Starshine Moonbeam (12/01/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Jesse F. Hughes (12/01/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed Billy Goat (12/01/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor J.E. (12/01/04)
• Re: Study: Stem Cell Therapy 100% More Effective Than Jesus ođin (12/01/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Mike Oliver (12/01/04)
• Re: Stack Overflow Keynes (12/01/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed Iain (12/01/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Dave Seaman (12/01/04)
• Re: Study: Stem Cell Therapy 100% More Effective Than Jesus Gactimus (12/01/04)
• Re: Does a "pure" real valued probability function mak Ross A. Finlayson (12/01/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Eray Ozkural exa (12/01/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor David C. Ullrich (12/01/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Dave Seaman (12/01/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Dave Seaman (12/01/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Eray Ozkural exa (12/01/04)
• Re: Does a "pure" real valued probability function mak David C. Ullrich (12/01/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor David C. Ullrich (12/01/04)
• Re: Does a "pure" real valued probability function mak Jon Haugsand (12/01/04)
• Re: Does a "pure" real valued probability function mak Tim Mellor (12/01/04)
• Re: logic is innate? Ross A. Finlayson (12/01/04)
• Re: logic is innate? Mitch Harris (12/01/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Jürgen R. (12/01/04)
• Re: Stack Overflow gswork (12/01/04)
• Re: logic is innate? Mitch Harris (12/01/04)
• Re: Stack Overflow Edward G. Nilges (12/01/04)
• Re: logic is innate? Jesse F. Hughes (12/01/04)
• Re: logic is innate? Jesse F. Hughes (12/01/04)
• Re: Street Philosophy JusUK (12/01/04)
• Re: Anybody else get Virus"W32.Beagle.AV@mm" from Muslim-hating Robert Kolker? Randy Poe (12/01/04)
• Anybody else get Virus"W32.Beagle.AV@mm" from Muslim-hating Robert Kolker? John (12/01/04)
• Re: Is (x)(y)Rxy Symmetric? FiSH (12/01/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed Denis Loubet (12/01/04)
• Re: Does a "pure" real valued probability function mak Ross A. Finlayson (12/01/04)
• Re: Study: Stem Cell Therapy 100% More Effective Than Jesus ođin (12/01/04)
• Re: Study: Stem Cell Therapy 100% More Effective Than Jesus Steve (12/01/04)
• Re: Does a "pure" real valued probability function mak George Cox (12/01/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed sAnToLiNa (12/01/04)
• Re: Study: Stem Cell Therapy 100% More Effective Than Jesus Gactimus (12/01/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed Gactimus (12/01/04)
• Study: Stem Cell Therapy 100% More Effective Than Jesus Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting Ass (12/01/04)
• Does a "pure" real valued probability function mak SkanderH (12/01/04)
• Re: logic is innate? Babylonian_Astrologer (12/01/04)
• Re: Stack Overflow Chris Thomson (12/01/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed Billy Goat (12/01/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed firstjois (12/01/04)
• [FAQ, 99/07/28] Mathematical logic on the web Boris 'pi' Piwinger (12/01/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed Woden (12/01/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed Steve O (12/01/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed bluskie (12/01/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed bluskie (12/01/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Dave Seaman (12/01/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed John Popelish (11/30/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed John Popelish (11/30/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor David C. Ullrich (11/30/04)
• Re: logic is innate? Mike Oliver (11/30/04)
• Re: HUMAN Brain Not Built for Logic Acid Pooh (11/30/04)
• Re: logic is innate? Acid Pooh (11/30/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed EjP (11/30/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed tim gueguen (11/30/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed GoDrex (11/30/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed tim gueguen (11/30/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed Denis Loubet (11/30/04)
• Re: Stack Overflow Keynes (11/30/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed Neil Kelsey (11/30/04)
• Re: logic is innate? Jesse F. Hughes (11/30/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Dave Seaman (11/30/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed Singleterry (11/30/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed Woden (11/30/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed Marc Satterwhite (11/30/04)
• Re: 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed Rally (11/30/04)
• Re: logic is innate? Mike Oliver (11/30/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Daryl McCullough (11/30/04)
• 100% Convinced vs. 100% Committed Gactimus (11/30/04)
• Re: logic is innate? Acid Pooh (11/30/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Dave Seaman (11/30/04)
• Re: HUMAN Brain Not Built for Logic Paleo-Conservative (11/30/04)
• Re: HUMAN Brain Not Built for Logic Paleo-Conservative (11/30/04)
• Re: HUMAN Brain Not Built for Logic Paleo-Conservative (11/30/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Dave Seaman (11/30/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Jasper Stein (11/30/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Jasper Stein (11/30/04)
• Re: HUMAN Brain Not Built for Logic Paleo-Conservative (11/30/04)
• Re: HUMAN Brain Not Built for Logic Paleo-Conservative (11/30/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor David C. Ullrich (11/30/04)
• Re: HUMAN Brain Not Built for Logic Paleo-Conservative (11/30/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? G. Frege (11/30/04)
• Re: logic is innate? Ron Peterson (11/30/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Dave Seaman (11/30/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor David C. Ullrich (11/30/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Jasper Stein (11/30/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Frank Piron (11/30/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Torkel Franzen (11/30/04)
• Stack Overflow Chris Thomson (11/30/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Frank Piron (11/30/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Daryl McCullough (11/30/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor David C. Ullrich (11/30/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Dave Seaman (11/30/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Jasper Stein (11/30/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Jasper Stein (11/30/04)
• Re: HUMAN Brain Not Built for Logic Acid Pooh (11/30/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Acme Diagnostics (11/30/04)
• Re: HUMAN Brain Not Built for Logic Acme Diagnostics (11/30/04)
• Re: logic is innate? Jesse F. Hughes (11/30/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Jürgen R. (11/30/04)
• Re: HUMAN Brain Not Built for Logic Paleo-Conservative (11/30/04)
• Re: HUMAN Brain Not Built for Logic Paleo-Conservative (11/30/04)
• Re: NOVA show on Cave of Letters and relation to Jesus Archimedes Plutonium (11/30/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness EL (11/30/04)
• Re: What's this function called? tinyurl.com/uh3t (11/30/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Ross A. Finlayson (11/30/04)
• Re: HUMAN Brain Not Built for Logic Acme Diagnostics (11/30/04)
• Re: November 25 is Infinite Clause day!! tinyurl.com/uh3t (11/30/04)
• Re: logic is innate? Eray Ozkural exa (11/30/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Daryl McCullough (11/30/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Kenneth Doyle (11/30/04)
• Re: On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. George Greene (11/30/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor George Greene (11/30/04)
• Re: Infinite number of football teams George Greene (11/30/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor II George Greene (11/30/04)
• Re: logic is innate? George Cox (11/29/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? George Greene (11/29/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Chris Menzel (11/29/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Acid Pooh (11/29/04)
• Re: HUMAN Brain Not Built for Logic Acme Diagnostics (11/29/04)
• Re: logic is innate? Acid Pooh (11/29/04)
• sampling algoritm based on indexed constrains Albretch (11/29/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness hanson (11/29/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Daryl McCullough (11/29/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Mike Oliver (11/29/04)
• On the [Possible] Undecidability of Goldbach's Conjecture [in PA]. namducnguyen (11/29/04)
• Re: I came here to babble incoherently about and the universe. Jasper Stein (11/29/04)
• Re: logic is innate? Mitch Harris (11/29/04)
• Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong? Dave Seaman (11/29/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Frank Piron (11/29/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Frank Piron (11/29/04)
• Re: Street Philosophy zerkanX (11/29/04)
• Re: November 25 is Infinite Clause day!! Jesse F. Hughes (11/29/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor David C. Ullrich (11/29/04)
• Re: Uncountable many reals without Cantor Torkel Franzen (11/29/04)
• Uncountable many reals without Cantor Frank Piron (11/29/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Chairman of the David Hilbert Appreciation Society (11/29/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? KRamsay (11/29/04)
• Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong? Brian Chandler (11/29/04)
• Re: HUMAN Brain Not Built for Logic Acid Pooh (11/29/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Josh Purinton (11/29/04)
• Re: HUMAN Brain Not Built for Logic Chris Menzel (11/29/04)
• Re: So you want to count an infinite power set ? tinyurl.com/uh3t (11/29/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Poker Joker (11/29/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Daryl McCullough (11/29/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor II Daryl McCullough (11/29/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor II Daryl McCullough (11/29/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Daryl McCullough (11/29/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Chairman of the David Hilbert Appreciation Society (11/29/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor II Daryl McCullough (11/29/04)
• Re: New countable infiniity logic Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (11/29/04)
• Re: HUMAN Brain Not Built for Logic Acme Diagnostics (11/29/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Ralph Becket (11/29/04)
• Re: Goedel applied to the real-world Albert (11/29/04)
• Re: HUMAN Brain Not Built for Logic Acme Diagnostics (11/29/04)
• Re: HUMAN Brain Not Built for Logic Acme Diagnostics (11/29/04)
• Re: HUMAN Brain Not Built for Logic Paleo-Conservative (11/29/04)
• Re: HUMAN Brain Not Built for Logic Acid Pooh (11/29/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Chris Menzel (11/29/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Pierre Asselin (11/28/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Stephen Harris (11/28/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Stephen Harris (11/28/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Stephen Harris (11/28/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Mike Oliver (11/28/04)
• [Another Successful Troll by Herc] (no longer mentions): Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Kent Paul Dolan (11/28/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Stephen Harris (11/28/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor II Poker Joker (11/28/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Stephen Harris (11/28/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Virgil (11/28/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Poker Joker (11/28/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor George Greene (11/28/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor II George Greene (11/28/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (11/28/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Daryl McCullough (11/28/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? George Greene (11/28/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu (11/28/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor George Greene (11/28/04)
• Re: Street Philosophy JusUK (11/28/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Poker Joker (11/28/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Chris Menzel (11/28/04)
• Re: HUMAN Brain Not Built for Logic Chris Menzel (11/28/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Daryl McCullough (11/28/04)
• Re: Is (x)(y)Rxy Symmetric? William Elliot (11/28/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Poker Joker (11/28/04)
• Re: Is (x)(y)Rxy Symmetric? R-matrix (11/28/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Daryl McCullough (11/28/04)
• Re: HUMAN Brain Not Built for Logic Paleo-Conservative (11/28/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Chairman of the David Hilbert Appreciation Society (11/28/04)
• Re: What does it mean in other words (arithmetic)? Konrad Den Ende (11/28/04)
• Re: Goedel applied to the real-world The Sophist (11/28/04)
• Re: Street Philosophy Mike Oliver (11/28/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Mike (11/28/04)
• Re: Street Philosophy JusUK (11/28/04)
• Re: Street Philosophy zerkanX (11/28/04)
• Re: What does it mean in other words (arithmetic)? Chris Menzel (11/28/04)
• Re: Street Philosophy zerkanX (11/28/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Nimish Shah (11/28/04)
• What does it mean in other words (arithmetic)? Konrad Den Ende (11/28/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Stephen Harris (11/28/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Stephen Harris (11/28/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Mike Saburov (11/28/04)
• Re: Infinite number of football teams William Elliot (11/28/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Chris Menzel (11/28/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness EL (11/28/04)
• Re: Is (x)(y)Rxy Symmetric? William Elliot (11/28/04)
• Re: Street Philosophy Chris Menzel (11/28/04)
• Re: Street Philosophy JusUK (11/28/04)
• Re: Street Philosophy JusUK (11/28/04)
• Re: Goedel applied to the real-world Barb Knox (11/28/04)
• Re: Goedel applied to the real-world Torkel Franzen (11/28/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Virgil (11/28/04)
• Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong? fishfry (11/28/04)
• Re: Goedel applied to the real-world Barb Knox (11/28/04)
• Re: Infinite number of football teams HERC777 (11/28/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor II Poker Joker (11/28/04)
• Re: HUMAN Brain Not Built for Logic Acid Pooh (11/28/04)
• induction vs Cantor II Poker Joker (11/28/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness Acid Pooh (11/28/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Poker Joker (11/28/04)
• Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong? Ross A. Finlayson (11/28/04)
• Re: Infinite number of football teams George Greene (11/28/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? George Greene (11/28/04)
• HUMAN Brain Not Built for Logic Paleo-Conservative (11/28/04)
• Re: Does this list contain pi? Rupert (11/28/04)
• Re: November 25 is Infinite Clause day!! HERC777 (11/28/04)
• Re: Street Philosophy Just Playing (11/28/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness ernobe (11/28/04)
• Re: Street Philosophy Mike Oliver (11/28/04)
• Re: Street Philosophy Mr. Smith (11/27/04)
• Re: Goedel applied to the real-world Barb Knox (11/27/04)
• Re: So you want to count an infinite power set ? Phil Carmody (11/27/04)
• Re: Infinite number of football teams HERC777 (11/27/04)
• Re: Infinite number of football teams HERC777 (11/27/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Mike Oliver (11/27/04)
• Re: Street Philosophy Barb Knox (11/27/04)
• Re: So you want to count an infinite power set ? tinyurl.com/uh3t (11/27/04)
• Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong? Mr. Smith (11/27/04)
• Re: Infinite number of football teams Barb Knox (11/27/04)
• Re: Infinite number of football teams Richard Henry (11/27/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor J.E. (11/27/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Daryl McCullough (11/27/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Daryl McCullough (11/27/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Daryl McCullough (11/27/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Daryl McCullough (11/27/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Virgil (11/27/04)
• Re: Is (x)(y)Rxy Symmetric? R-matrix (11/27/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Virgil (11/27/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? festoon (11/27/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times George Greene (11/27/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? George Greene (11/27/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? George Greene (11/27/04)
• Re: Is (x)(y)Rxy Symmetric? George Greene (11/27/04)
• to steven David Mooney (11/27/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Mike Oliver (11/27/04)
• Re: Infinite number of football teams steven (11/27/04)
• Re: Does this list contain pi? The Ghost In The Machine (11/27/04)
• Re: Does this list contain pi? The Ghost In The Machine (11/27/04)
• Re: Infinite number of football teams Dave Seaman (11/27/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Dave Seaman (11/27/04)
• Infinite number of football teams David Mooney (11/27/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Poker Joker (11/27/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Poker Joker (11/27/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Poker Joker (11/27/04)
• Re: Street Philosophy Say what? (11/27/04)
• Re: Street Philosophy Just Playing (11/27/04)
• Re: Is (x)(y)Rxy Symmetric? R-matrix (11/27/04)
• Re: Does this list contain pi? Richard Henry (11/27/04)
• Re: Does this list contain pi? Richard Henry (11/27/04)
• Re: Groups and transfinite induction David C. Ullrich (11/27/04)
• Re: cont: example of an undecidable sentence Torkel Franzen (11/27/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Fenix (11/27/04)
• Re: Street Philosophy zerkanX (11/27/04)
• Re: Does this list contain pi? Tim Mellor (11/27/04)
• Re: Street Philosophy JusUK (11/27/04)
• Re: Street Philosophy zerkanX (11/27/04)
• Re: Groups and transfinite induction mareg_at_mimosa.csv.warwick.ac.uk (11/27/04)
• Re: Does this list contain pi? HERC777 (11/27/04)
• Re: Groups and transfinite induction David C. Ullrich (11/27/04)
• Re: Is (x)(y)Rxy Symmetric? David C. Ullrich (11/27/04)
• Re: Does this list contain pi? David C. Ullrich (11/27/04)
• Re: Groups and transfinite induction David C. Ullrich (11/27/04)
• Re: Street Philosophy JusUK (11/27/04)
• Re: Is (x)(y)Rxy Symmetric? William Elliot (11/27/04)
• Re: Does this list contain pi? HERC777 (11/27/04)
• Re: Is (x)(y)Rxy Symmetric? R-matrix (11/27/04)
• Re: Does this list contain pi? Rupert (11/27/04)
• Re: Does this list contain pi? HERC777 (11/27/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Ron Sperber (11/27/04)
• Re: Is (x)(y)Rxy Symmetric? William Elliot (11/27/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Virgil (11/27/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Virgil (11/27/04)
• Re: Does this list contain pi? The Ghost In The Machine (11/27/04)
• Re: NOVA show on Cave of Letters and relation to Jesus Philip Deitiker (11/27/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Dave Seaman (11/27/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Dave Seaman (11/27/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Dave Seaman (11/27/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Bill Taylor (11/27/04)
• Re: Street Philosophy Just Playing (11/27/04)
• Re: Is (x)(y)Rxy Symmetric? R-matrix (11/27/04)
• Is (x)(y)Rxy Symmetric? R-matrix (11/27/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Poker Joker (11/27/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Poker Joker (11/27/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Poker Joker (11/27/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Poker Joker (11/27/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Virgil (11/27/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Virgil (11/27/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Virgil (11/27/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Virgil (11/27/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Poker Joker (11/27/04)
• Re: New countable infiniity logic Barb Knox (11/27/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Ralph Becket (11/27/04)
• Does this list contain pi? HERC777 (11/27/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Peter Webb (11/27/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness Acid Pooh (11/27/04)
• Re: So you want to count an infinite power set ? HERC777 (11/27/04)
• Re: So you want to count an infinite power set ? George Greene (11/27/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Poker Joker (11/27/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? George Greene (11/27/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? KRamsay (11/27/04)
• Re: Groups and transfinite induction David C. Ullrich (11/27/04)
• Re: Groups and transfinite induction mareg_at_mimosa.csv.warwick.ac.uk (11/27/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Poker Joker (11/26/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Poker Joker (11/26/04)
• Re: I came here to babble incoherently about and the universe. Lefty (11/26/04)
• Re: DISPROOF of the uncountability of reals HERC777 (11/26/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Virgil (11/26/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Virgil (11/26/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Virgil (11/26/04)
• Re: Groups and transfinite induction Jean-Pierre MERX (11/26/04)
• Re: So you want to count an infinite power set ? tinyurl.com/uh3t (11/26/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor The Ghost In The Machine (11/26/04)
• Re: DISPROOF of the uncountability of reals The Ghost In The Machine (11/26/04)
• Re: Groups and transfinite induction Arturo Magidin (11/26/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Dave Seaman (11/26/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Dave Seaman (11/26/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Poker Joker (11/26/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Chairman of the David Hilbert Appreciation Society (11/26/04)
• Groups and transfinite induction Jean-Pierre MERX (11/26/04)
• Re: Null-Axiom Set Theory George Greene (11/26/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Poker Joker (11/26/04)
• Re: November 25 is Infinite Clause day!! George Greene (11/26/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Poker Joker (11/26/04)
• Re: New countable infiniity logic tinyurl.com/uh3t (11/26/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Poker Joker (11/26/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Poker Joker (11/26/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Ron Sperber (11/26/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor robert j. kolker (11/26/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Poker Joker (11/26/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Virgil (11/26/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Poker Joker (11/26/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Poker Joker (11/26/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor fishfry (11/26/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Chairman of the David Hilbert Appreciation Society (11/26/04)
• Re: DISPROOF of the uncountability of reals Stephen Harris (11/26/04)
• Re: Quantum logic for non mathematicians Mr. Smith (11/26/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Mike Saburov (11/26/04)
• Re: DISPROOF of the uncountability of reals The Ghost In The Machine (11/26/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Norm Dresner (11/26/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Poker Joker (11/26/04)
• Re: induction vs Cantor Torkel Franzen (11/26/04)
• induction vs Cantor Poker Joker (11/26/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Stephen Harris (11/26/04)
• Re: DISPROOF of the uncountability of reals Stephen Harris (11/26/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Mike Oliver (11/26/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Daryl McCullough (11/26/04)
• Street Philosophy zerkanX (11/26/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness zerkanX (11/26/04)
• Re: NOVA show on Cave of Letters and relation to Jesus Archimedes Plutonium (11/26/04)
• Re: here we go again with India and Pakistan over Kashmir; we needa M.A.D. Fleet in place Archimedes Plutonium (11/26/04)
• Re: NOVA show on Cave of Letters and relation to Jesus Day Brown (11/26/04)
• Re: DISPROOF of the uncountability of reals Victor Eijkhout (11/26/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness EL (11/26/04)
• Re: Null-Axiom Set Theory Ross A. Finlayson (11/26/04)
• Quantum logic for non mathematicians SkanderH (11/26/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness EL (11/26/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Bill Taylor (11/26/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Bill Taylor (11/26/04)
• Re: So you want to count an infinite power set ? tinyurl.com/uh3t (11/26/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Poker Joker (11/26/04)
• Re: DISPROOF of the uncountability of reals HERC777 (11/26/04)
• Re: DISPROOF of the uncountability of reals The Ghost In The Machine (11/26/04)
• Re: DISPROOF of the uncountability of reals HERC777 (11/26/04)
• Re: DISPROOF of the uncountability of reals Chakravarthi (11/26/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness Mr. Smith (11/26/04)
• Re: here we go again with India and Pakistan over Kashmir; we need a M.A.D. Fleet in place Sean (11/26/04)
• Re: So you want to count an infinite power set ? Phil Carmody (11/26/04)
• DISPROOF of the uncountability of reals HERC777 (11/25/04)
• Re: I came here to babble incoherently about and the universe. Lefty (11/25/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Mike Oliver (11/25/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Ralph Becket (11/25/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? George Greene (11/25/04)
• Re: Cantor's fatal mistake a la Zenkin The Ghost In The Machine (11/25/04)
• Re: I think logic is obsolete today . . . . . . JusUK (11/25/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness JusUK (11/25/04)
• Re: Null-Axiom Set Theory Charlie-Boo (11/25/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness Acid Pooh (11/25/04)
• cont: example of an undecidable sentence shane (11/25/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Mike Oliver (11/25/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Mr. Smith (11/25/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Mike Oliver (11/25/04)
• Re: I came here to babble incoherently about and the universe. Lefty (11/25/04)
• Re: So you want to count an infinite power set ? tinyurl.com/uh3t (11/25/04)
• Re: Cantor's fatal mistake a la Zenkin Poker Joker (11/25/04)
• Re: Cantor's fatal mistake a la Zenkin The Ghost In The Machine (11/25/04)
• Re: Cantor's fatal mistake a la Zenkin Poker Joker (11/25/04)
• Re: David Ullrich answer the questions please........... David C. Ullrich (11/25/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Jerzy Karczmarczuk (11/25/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Stephen Harris (11/25/04)
• Re: Cantor's fatal mistake a la Zenkin Tim Mellor (11/25/04)
• Re: Curry's paradox - (Google=Google?) Neil Coward (11/25/04)
• NOVA show on Cave of Letters and relation to Jesus Archimedes Plutonium (11/25/04)
• Re: I came here to babble incoherently about and the universe. Jasper Stein (11/25/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness EL (11/25/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness Johnny (11/25/04)
• Re: Man, Mr. bush Jr. sure is wicked evil eh? Stonepuppet (11/25/04)
• Re: Null-Axiom Set Theory Ross A. Finlayson (11/25/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? George Greene (11/25/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? George Greene (11/25/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness EL (11/25/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Jesse F. Hughes (11/25/04)
• Re: I came here to babble incoherently about and the universe. William Elliot (11/25/04)
• Re: I came here to babble incoherently about and the universe. William Elliot (11/25/04)
• Re: New countable infiniity logic Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (11/25/04)
• Re: Null-Axiom Set Theory George Greene (11/25/04)
• Re: Null-Axiom Set Theory George Greene (11/25/04)
• Re: I came here to babble incoherently about and the universe. Lefty (11/25/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness June R Harton (11/25/04)
• Re: Agree with Ghost or not? ANSWER THE QUESTION HERC777 (11/25/04)
• Re: I came here to babble incoherently about and the universe. Lefty (11/25/04)
• Re: I came here to babble incoherently about and the universe. Lefty (11/25/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Mike Oliver (11/25/04)
• Re: I came here to babble incoherently about and the universe. Lefty (11/25/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Bill Taylor (11/25/04)
• Re: Cantor's fatal mistake a la Zenkin Poker Joker (11/25/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Barb Knox (11/25/04)
• Re: Cantor's fatal mistake a la Zenkin The Ghost In The Machine (11/25/04)
• Re: Agree with Ghost or not? ANSWER THE QUESTION John Savard (11/25/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness Acid Pooh (11/25/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Pierre Asselin (11/25/04)
• Re: I came here to babble incoherently about and the universe. George Cox (11/25/04)
• Re: Null-Axiom Set Theory George Cox (11/25/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Mike Oliver (11/25/04)
• Re: Null-Axiom Set Theory Barb Knox (11/24/04)
• Re: The definition of consciousness hanson (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind robert j. kolker (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Barb Knox (11/24/04)
• Cantor's fatal mistake a la Zenkin Poker Joker (11/24/04)
• Re: David Ullrich answer the questions please........... David C. Ullrich (11/24/04)
• Null-Axiom Set Theory Ross A. Finlayson (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Poker Joker (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Poker Joker (11/24/04)
• Re: stop making sense! Torkel Franzen (11/24/04)
• The definition of consciousness EL (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Jesse F. Hughes (11/24/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Josh Purinton (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind stephen_at_nomail.com (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Dave Seaman (11/24/04)
• Re: I came here to babble incoherently about and the universe. Lefty (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Jesse F. Hughes (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Dave Seaman (11/24/04)
• Re: David Ullrich answer the questions please........... David C. Ullrich (11/24/04)
• Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong? Ross A. Finlayson (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Lee Rudolph (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Barb Knox (11/24/04)
• Re: indescribable reals Tim Mellor (11/24/04)
• Beth's method Mike Saburov (11/24/04)
• Re: I came here to babble incoherently about and the universe. Jasper Stein (11/24/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Chris Menzel (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Jesse F. Hughes (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Jesse F. Hughes (11/24/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Ketil Malde (11/24/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? George Greene (11/24/04)
• Re: indescribable reals Peter Webb (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind The Ghost In The Machine (11/24/04)
• Re: indescribable reals The Ghost In The Machine (11/24/04)
• Re: Agree with Ghost or not? ANSWER THE QUESTION The Ghost In The Machine (11/24/04)
• Re: I came here to babble incoherently about and the universe. William Elliot (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind HERC777 (11/24/04)
• Re: get me a printout on that Data! HERC777 (11/24/04)
• Re: get me a printout on that Data! fishfry (11/24/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Mike Oliver (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Poker Joker (11/24/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Daryl McCullough (11/24/04)
• get me a printout on that Data! HERC777 (11/24/04)
• Re: indescribable reals Poker Joker (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Josh Purinton (11/24/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Charlie-Boo (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind HERC777 (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind fishfry (11/24/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Bill Taylor (11/24/04)
• Re: indescribable reals Poker Joker (11/24/04)
• Re: indescribable reals Poker Joker (11/24/04)
• Re: I came here to babble incoherently about and the universe. Lefty (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Poker Joker (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Poker Joker (11/24/04)
• Re: indescribable reals Poker Joker (11/24/04)
• Re: indescribable reals Barb Knox (11/24/04)
• Re: Daryl answer the question please....... Daryl McCullough (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Josh Purinton (11/24/04)
• Re: indescribable reals Peter Webb (11/24/04)
• Re: indescribable reals Barb Knox (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind stephen_at_nomail.com (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Poker Joker (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Poker Joker (11/24/04)
• indescribable reals Poker Joker (11/24/04)
• Re: Curry's paradox - (Google=Google?) Wordsmith (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind stephen_at_nomail.com (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Josh Purinton (11/24/04)
• Re: Daryl answer the question please....... Daryl McCullough (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Poker Joker (11/24/04)
• Re: Daryl answer the question please....... Daryl McCullough (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Poker Joker (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind stephen_at_nomail.com (11/24/04)
• Re: I came here to babble incoherently about and the universe. Lefty (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind HERC777 (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Poker Joker (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Barb Knox (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind stephen_at_nomail.com (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Poker Joker (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Poker Joker (11/24/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Poker Joker (11/24/04)
• Re: Curry's paradox - (Google=Google?) George Greene (11/23/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Josh Purinton (11/23/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Poker Joker (11/23/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Josh Purinton (11/23/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Barb Knox (11/23/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind George Greene (11/23/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind stephen_at_nomail.com (11/23/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Ogie Oglethorpe (11/23/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Poker Joker (11/23/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Carsten Schultz (11/23/04)
• Re: New countable infiniity logic tinyurl.com/uh3t (11/23/04)
• Re: Daryl McCullough ANSWER THE QUESTION HERC777 (11/23/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind HERC777 (11/23/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Josh Purinton (11/23/04)
• Re: Daryl McCullough ANSWER THE QUESTION HERC777 (11/23/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Mike Oliver (11/23/04)
• Re: ex: an undecidable sentence Charlie-Boo (11/23/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Barb Knox (11/23/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Acid Pooh (11/23/04)
• Re: Goedel applied to the real-world Charlie-Boo (11/23/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Acid Pooh (11/23/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind HERC777 (11/23/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Josh Purinton (11/23/04)
• Re: I came here to babble incoherently about and the universe. Jim Braun (11/23/04)
• Re: here we go again with India and Pakistan over Kashmir; we need a M.A.D. Fleet in place Archimedes Plutonium (11/23/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Nathan (11/23/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Mike Oliver (11/23/04)
• Re: Daryl McCullough ANSWER THE QUESTION Jesse F. Hughes (11/23/04)
• Re: Goedel applied to the real-world Charlie-Boo (11/23/04)
• Re: Agree with Ghost or not? ANSWER THE QUESTION Randy Poe (11/23/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Josh Purinton (11/23/04)
• Re: Curry's paradox - (Google=Google?) Charlie-Boo (11/23/04)
• Re: Josh Purinton ANSWER THE QUESTION! Randy Poe (11/23/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Tim Mellor (11/23/04)
• Re: Bottle Problem Benno G. (11/23/04)
• Re: Daryl McCullough ANSWER THE QUESTION Herman Rubin (11/23/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Daryl McCullough (11/23/04)
• Re: Daryl McCullough KILLFILE THE TROLL Phil Carmody (11/23/04)
• Re: Daryl McCullough ANSWER THE QUESTION Daryl McCullough (11/23/04)
• Re: So you want to count an infinite power set ? Phil Carmody (11/23/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Herman Rubin (11/23/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Eray Ozkural exa (11/23/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind HERC777 (11/23/04)
• Re: logic of the Cantorian followers mind Tim Mellor (11/23/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Josh Purinton (11/23/04)
• Re: here we go again with India and Pakistan over Kashmir; we need a M.A.D. Fleet in place richj (11/23/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Josh Purinton (11/23/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Frank Piron (11/23/04)
• Re: I came here to babble incoherently about and the universe. Jasper Stein (11/23/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Josh Purinton (11/23/04)
• Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong? George Greene (11/23/04)
• Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong? George Greene (11/23/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Josh Purinton (11/23/04)
• Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong? George Greene (11/23/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Josh Purinton (11/23/04)
• Re: Agree with Ghost or not? ANSWER THE QUESTION HERC777 (11/23/04)
• Re: Agree with Ghost or not? ANSWER THE QUESTION John Savard (11/23/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Mark Nudelman (11/23/04)
• Re: I came here to babble incoherently about and the universe. William Elliot (11/23/04)
• Re: So you want to count an infinite power set ? tinyurl.com/uh3t (11/23/04)
• Josh Purinton ANSWER THE QUESTION! HERC777 (11/23/04)
• Daryl McCullough ANSWER THE QUESTION HERC777 (11/23/04)
• Barb Knox ANSWER THE QUESTION! HERC777 (11/23/04)
• Agree with Ghost or not? ANSWER THE QUESTION HERC777 (11/23/04)
• Re: I came here to babble incoherently about and the universe. herc777_at_hotmail.com (11/23/04)
• Re: I came here to babble incoherently about and the universe. Josh Purinton (11/23/04)
• I came here to babble incoherently about and the universe. Lefty (11/23/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Dan Christensen (11/23/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Josh Purinton (11/23/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? herc777_at_hotmail.com (11/23/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Mike Oliver (11/23/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Barb Knox (11/23/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Mike Oliver (11/23/04)
• Re: Liberal Hedonism ;-( Anticorporation (11/23/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Bill Taylor (11/23/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Josh Purinton (11/23/04)
• Re: Bottle Problem Barb Knox (11/23/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Stephen Harris (11/23/04)
• Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times Stephen Harris (11/23/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Acid Pooh (11/23/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? herc777_at_hotmail.com (11/23/04)
• Re: Bottle Problem Barb Knox (11/23/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? George Cox (11/23/04)
• Re: New countable infiniity logic Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (11/22/04)
• Re: New countable infiniity logic Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (11/22/04)
• Re: Goedel applied to the real-world Acme Diagnostics (11/22/04)
• Re: Goedel applied to the real-world Acme Diagnostics (11/22/04)
• Re: I think logic is obsolete today . . . . . . Acme Diagnostics (11/22/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Charlie-Boo (11/22/04)
• COUNTING an infinite POWERSET herc777_at_hotmail.com (11/22/04)
• logic of the Cantorian followers mind herc777_at_hotmail.com (11/22/04)
• Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong? Ross A. Finlayson (11/22/04)
• Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong? Ross A. Finlayson (11/22/04)
• Re: I think logic is obsolete today . . . . . . Acid Pooh (11/22/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? J.L. Perez-de-la-Cruz (11/22/04)
• Re: What is a proof, exactly? Josh Purinton (11/22/04)
• Re: New countable infiniity logic Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (11/22/04)
• Re: New countable infiniity logic Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (11/22/04)
• What is a proof, exactly? Jasper Stein (11/22/04)
• Re: Automatic generation of Gödel sentence for a given formal system Frank Piron (11/22/04)
• Re: Bottle Problem Benno G. (11/22/04)
• Re: Bottle Problem Benno G. (11/22/04)
• Re: Goedel applied to the real-world Chris Menzel (11/22/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Chris Menzel (11/22/04)
• Re: Goedel applied to the real-world Torkel Franzen (11/22/04)
• Re: Liberal Hedonism ;-( Patrick Powers (11/22/04)
• Re: Goedel applied to the real-world Patrick Powers (11/22/04)
• Re: I think logic is obsolete today . . . . . . William Elliot (11/22/04)
• Re: I think logic is obsolete today . . . . . . William Elliot (11/22/04)
• Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong? num num (11/22/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Josh Purinton (11/22/04)
• Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem Charlie-Boo (11/22/04)
• Re: Curry's paradox - (Google=Google?) Charlie-Boo (11/22/04)
• Re: November 25 is Infinite Clause day!! Charlie-Boo (11/22/04)
• Re: I think logic is obsolete today . . . . . . Torkel Franzen (11/22/04)
• Re: I think logic is obsolete today . . . . . . Acid Pooh (11/22/04)
• Re: November 25 is Infinite Clause day!! Chairman of the David Hilbert Appreciation Society (11/22/04)
• Re: November 25 is Infinite Clause day!! The Ghost In The Machine (11/22/04)
• Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong? Mike Oliver (11/22/04)
• Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong? Chris Menzel (11/21/04)
• Re: New countable infiniity logic Dave Seaman (11/21/04)
• Re: New countable infiniity logic tinyurl.com/uh3t (11/21/04)
• Re: I think logic is obsolete today . . . . . . George Dance (11/21/04)
• Re: November 25 is Infinite Clause day!! George Dance (11/21/04)
• Re: New countable infiniity logic tinyurl.com/uh3t (11/21/04)
• Re: New countable infiniity logic tinyurl.com/uh3t (11/21/04)
• Re: New countable infiniity logic tinyurl.com/uh3t (11/21/04)
• Re: New countable infiniity logic tinyurl.com/uh3t (11/21/04)
• Re: November 25 is Infinite Clause day!! John Savard (11/21/04)
• Re: So you want to count an infinite power set ? tinyurl.com/uh3t (11/21/04)
• Re: So you want to count an infinite power set ? tinyurl.com/uh3t (11/21/04)
• Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong? Eray Ozkural exa (11/21/04)
• Re: November 25 is Infinite Clause day!! The Ghost In The Machine (11/21/04)
• Re: Bottle Problem The Ghost In The Machine (11/21/04)
• Re: Bottle Problem William Elliot (11/21/04)
• Bottle Problem Benno G. (11/21/04)
• Re: do proofs for representability rely on second-order logic? Torkel Franzen (11/21/04)
• do proofs for representability rely on second-order logic? shane (11/21/04)
• Re: ex: an undecidable sentence Torkel Franzen (11/21/04)

Last message date: 12/31/04
Archived on: 12/31/04 GMT

---

1774 messages sorted by: [ thread ]