Re: Complete Arithmetic?
From: David C. Ullrich (ullrich_at_math.okstate.edu)
Date: 01/03/05
- Next message: Charlie-Boo: "Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem"
- Previous message: Charlie-Boo: "Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem"
- In reply to: Steven: "Re: Complete Arithmetic?"
- Next in thread: Russell Easterly: "Re: Complete Arithmetic?"
- Reply: Russell Easterly: "Re: Complete Arithmetic?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 13:59:31 -0600
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 15:14:36 +0100, Steven <steven2000@despammed.com>
wrote:
>> (Some computer guys down the hall have some thoughts
>> that seem quite far-fetched to me about using
>> "genetic programming" to solve some unsolved problem
>> in mathematics. They were planning on going for
>> Fermat's Last Theorem until I told them that that
>> had been done...)
>Building automated theorem prover is a great challenge, and much research
>has been done here, but still the abilities are way beyond expectations.
>The more interesting axiom systems are not complete, but this is not such a
>big problem; rather the computational complexity is. Going for Fermat's
>theorem seems very naive, if you consider the abilities of todays automated
>theorem prover... they usually fail with theorems that can be shown by
>schoolkids.
>Genetic programming can be regarded as a buzzword. There are rumours about
>very successful applications of that approach, but I think they are
>obtained with "Core Wars", an assembly language game with about 10
>commands.
>Theorem provers are useful to verify formal proofs, and to do a lot of
>rather trivial proving; but it still requires a human to do math.
In case it wasn't clear, that all seems perfectly correct to me - I
told the guys as much, (except for the bit about genetic programming
being a buzzword), but they've been very successful in using genetic
programming to play blackjack and so they're determined to move
on to unsolved mathematics...
>Have fun!
>
************************
David C. Ullrich
- Next message: Charlie-Boo: "Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem"
- Previous message: Charlie-Boo: "Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem"
- In reply to: Steven: "Re: Complete Arithmetic?"
- Next in thread: Russell Easterly: "Re: Complete Arithmetic?"
- Reply: Russell Easterly: "Re: Complete Arithmetic?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|