Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ?
From: Robert Kolker (bobkolker_at_comcast.net)
Date: 01/07/05
- Next message: Mark Adkins: "Cantor K.O.'d -- again!"
- Previous message: Raan: "Re: AI versus Human Consciousness"
- In reply to: Daryl McCullough: "Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ?"
- Next in thread: Tim Peters: "Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ?"
- Reply: Tim Peters: "Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 21:28:32 -0500
Daryl McCullough wrote:
>
> To say that an infinite coin sequence cs is computable to infinite
> length is to say that there is a single computable function f that
> can compute all the places in cs. The negation is this:
>
> Every computable function f computes only finitely many places in cs.
What about alternating heads/tails forever. That is a trivial function
which computers all the places. Odd places have heads, even places have
tails.
Bob Kolker
- Next message: Mark Adkins: "Cantor K.O.'d -- again!"
- Previous message: Raan: "Re: AI versus Human Consciousness"
- In reply to: Daryl McCullough: "Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ?"
- Next in thread: Tim Peters: "Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ?"
- Reply: Tim Peters: "Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|