Re: just 5 quick answers then I can summarise and GO
From: |-|erc (h_at_r.c)
Date: 01/11/05
- Next message: |-|erc: "Re: A Guide for the Perplexed?"
- Previous message: David Moews: "Re: In case you studied the GOTO theoretical language..."
- In reply to: george: "Re: just 5 quick answers then I can summarise and GO"
- Next in thread: george: "Re: just 5 quick answers then I can summarise and GO"
- Reply: george: "Re: just 5 quick answers then I can summarise and GO"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:55:56 +1000
"george" <greeneg@cs.unc.edu> wrote in
George I already told you,,
x appears in {{x}} is a trivial relation
all digits of <12345> appear IN ORDER in
{<123>, <1234>,<12345>}
is a sufficiently determined predicate.
You CAN ofcourse answer there is *no maximum|* to the number of digits
if you fell it is not defined, but there is no maximum to the number of integers say
*means* there are infinite integers.
Now shut up, you've been proven wrong twice, that means you substantiate
your whining or go away.
Herc
- Next message: |-|erc: "Re: A Guide for the Perplexed?"
- Previous message: David Moews: "Re: In case you studied the GOTO theoretical language..."
- In reply to: george: "Re: just 5 quick answers then I can summarise and GO"
- Next in thread: george: "Re: just 5 quick answers then I can summarise and GO"
- Reply: george: "Re: just 5 quick answers then I can summarise and GO"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|