Re: just 5 quick answers then I can summarise and GO
From: |-|erc (h_at_r.c)
Date: 01/11/05
- Next message: |-|erc: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Previous message: |-|erc: "Re: just 5 quick answers then I can summarise and GO"
- In reply to: John Savard: "Re: just 5 quick answers then I can summarise and GO"
- Next in thread: John Savard: "Re: just 5 quick answers then I can summarise and GO"
- Reply: John Savard: "Re: just 5 quick answers then I can summarise and GO"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 12:21:04 +1000
I am The Truman of Jim Carrey fame. Please help stop me being tortured since April 2002
with constant microwave laser from the Truman satelite splitting my head and tormenting me
and people around me. Not a prank, I am not crazy, The Truman Show made you think that
---------------------------------------------s-o-s-----------------------------------------
"John Savard" <jsavard@excxn.aNOSPAMb.cdn.invalid> wrote in message news:41e2d186.1451300@news.ecn.ab.ca...
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 03:12:08 +1000, "|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote, in part:
>
> >A)
> >SEQUENCE = <314159265..........................................................................>>
> >
> > <--- HOW MANY DIGITS???--->
>
> The decimal expansion of pi contains an infinite number of digits.
>
> >(B)
> >COMPUTABLES
> >1 <398498498.................>
> >2 <484849848.................>
> >3 <383873838.................>
> >..
> >
> >How many digits of (A) appear in correct sequence in (B), guaranteed?
> >
> >1 _______
>
> Pi is computable. But even for a real number, or infinite sequence of
> digits, it is guaranteed that, for any finite number N you pick, however
> large, you can find an entry in the list of computable numbers that has
> the first N digits of the sequence in the correct order, starting from
> the beginning.
>
> Thus, there is no digit in the infinite sequence so far to the left in
> (A) that you cannot find an element of (B) that matches the sequence *up
> to that digit*.
>
> But the infinite sequence in (A) _itself_ is still not guaranteed to be
> a member of (B), only an infinite number of sequences approaching it
> arbitrarily closely.
THE QUESTION IS : HOW MANY DIGITS OF A APPEAR IN ORDER IN POSITION IN B?
SEQUENCE = <314159265..........................................................................>
<--- HOW MANY DIGITS???--->
>
> >===================================================
> >
> >
> >(A)
> >RANDOM SEQUENCE = <654445676764545..............................................................>
> > <--- HOW MANY DIGITS???--->
> >
> >(B)
> >COMPUTABLES UTM(row, col) mod 10
> >1 <398498498.................>
> >2 <484849848.................>
> >3 <653873838.................>
> >..
> >
> >How many digits of (A) appear in correct sequence in (B), guaranteed?
> >
> >(Randomness could be introduced from outside the computer).
> >
> >2 __________
> >
> The answers are the same as for the case above, with the exception of
> the reference to pi being computable.
There is an answer, not ANSWERS. You didn't give a value.
How many digits of <6545894879439874389....> have property X?
There is no answer referring to a list here, that is just the property.
>
> >===================================================
> >
> >
> >So given a coin sequence <HTHHHTTHTTHTHTHTHHHTH.......................>
> >
> >How many flips (at least) of cs appear on the computable number list in order?
> >
> >CNL = UTM(row, col) mod 2
> >
> ><0010101010100101..>
> ><1010110110101001..>
> ><0000000000000000..>
> ><1111111111000000..>
> ><1010101010101010..>
> >..
> >
> >3 __________
> >
>
> Again, the answers are the same as for the case above.
WHAT ANSWER?
>
> >==================================================
> >
> >
> >> >> all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ?
> >>
> >> false
>
> Yup, that's the answer.
>
> >4 = "all coin sequences to infinite length appear (all flips in order) in any UTM computable list."
> >
> >4 <-> _________
>
> No, they do not.
you just said they did yesterday.
> >
> >=======================================================
> >
> >>
> >> >What about this one, any Cantorians want to assign it T or F?
> >>
> >> >"There is a maximum to the number of coins in any given oo coin sequence, that can be computed"
> >>
> >> false too
>
> Yup, that's the answer.
>
> >What is the opposite as a true proposition?
> >
> >5 ___________________________________________
> >
> For any infinite coin sequence, even if that sequence is not itself
> computable, any finite subset of that sequence, no matter how long, is
> computable.
>
in the same terms as the original PLEEEZE.
Herc
- Next message: |-|erc: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Previous message: |-|erc: "Re: just 5 quick answers then I can summarise and GO"
- In reply to: John Savard: "Re: just 5 quick answers then I can summarise and GO"
- Next in thread: John Savard: "Re: just 5 quick answers then I can summarise and GO"
- Reply: John Savard: "Re: just 5 quick answers then I can summarise and GO"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|