Re: ANSWER THE FCKING QUESTION GHOST
From: |-|erc (h_at_r.c)
Date: 01/11/05
- Next message: |-|erc: "Re: TIME STARTS NOW"
- Previous message: |-|erc: "Re: Yet Another Proof Of The Undecidability of HALT(M,I)"
- In reply to: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: ANSWER THE FCKING QUESTION GHOST"
- Next in thread: David C. Ullrich: "Re: ANSWER THE FCKING QUESTION GHOST"
- Reply: David C. Ullrich: "Re: ANSWER THE FCKING QUESTION GHOST"
- Reply: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: ANSWER THE FCKING QUESTION GHOST"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 15:17:54 +1000
>
> Neither follows from my answer, which involves all finite prefixes only.
> While all digits do appear (given any digit, it has a finite index),
> the number does not.
>
> It's the same problem as your favorite sequence
>
> <.3>
> <.33>
> <.333>
> <.3333>
> <.33333>
> ...
>
> which has all digits of 1/3. Does it contain 1/3? No.
>
> Your logic does not work.
>
*** YOU ARE STUPID.
you say ALL THE DIGITS OF PI APPEAR IN THE LIST.
THEN YOU SAY
only a finite number of them do.
YOU CANT COMPREHEND WHAT I AM DEMOING
SO JUST IGNORE ALL MY POSTS
SEE IF SOMEONE ELSE CAN ACTUALLY REASON.
Anyone else comment on those 2 statements.
Herc
- Next message: |-|erc: "Re: TIME STARTS NOW"
- Previous message: |-|erc: "Re: Yet Another Proof Of The Undecidability of HALT(M,I)"
- In reply to: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: ANSWER THE FCKING QUESTION GHOST"
- Next in thread: David C. Ullrich: "Re: ANSWER THE FCKING QUESTION GHOST"
- Reply: David C. Ullrich: "Re: ANSWER THE FCKING QUESTION GHOST"
- Reply: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: ANSWER THE FCKING QUESTION GHOST"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]