Re: TOO FUCKING GUTLESS TO ANSWER oo

From: Will Twentyman (wtwentyman_at_read.my.sig)
Date: 01/12/05 

Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 22:04:04 -0500

|-|erc wrote:

> "Will Twentyman" <wtwentyman@read.my.sig> wrote in
>
>>>>>>>Functional Programming Languages p 316
>>>>>>>To achieve this, we would simple need C to return an extra piece
>>>>>>>information to say when its result was known to be evaluated.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>(Good work "proving ESP" to me.)
>>>>
>>>>'cid 'ooh
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>I know. Proving the truth is easy. Convincing mathematicians to close their text books
>>>is the exercise.
>>>
>>>for the dimwit in you... 'how did I find that quote in under 30 minutes?'.
>>>
>>>Given: this just before
>>> Well, OK Herc. I just posted (11:16 pm, my time) a random number to a
>>> t ime stamped webpage. Try to use your magical ESP to guess the number.
>>> 'cid 'ooh
>>
>>It's called "sarcasm". You didn't guess his number, which was his test.
>>
>
>
> that was written before he issued the challenge will. try to keep up. If I correct you
> and you ignore it, like on 20 threads this week, then your turn is up.
>
> OK, find a quote, 5 minutes from this post that associates with 'using the timestamp
> to prove a point'.
>
> None of you noticed I threw this one straight back at you.
>
> Up to the challenge you just claimed was trivial?

You claim ESP, if you don't accept is challenge, offer a precise way to
prove it. Associations can be ill-defined, and most of the ones you
offer make no sense to me. 

-- 
Will Twentyman
email: wtwentyman at copper dot net
Loading