Re: WELL WHICH IS IT... ?

From: |-|erc (h_at_r.c)
Date: 01/21/05 

Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 14:42:30 +1000

"george" <greeneg@cs.unc.edu> wrote in
> Not according to you.
> The actual answer, which is that it is "on, to any
> finite number of digits", is one that you have been
> at pains to deny. UNTIL YOU ACCEPT *that* answer,
> you DON'T HAVE ANY coherent answer to this question,
> sothe answer must be Other.

that is the correct answer to another question.

What portion of digits <<<QUESTION
are on the list of finite prefixes <<<<CLAUSE

You are supposed to answer the question without reference to the clause.

>
> JEEZUS, dip***: THIS IS EXACTLY THE SAME QUESTION
> as the one you just answered "false" to above!!
>

I indented them incase people couldn't figure out they were quotes of contradictory
answers from other people, Will and Ghost.

Herc

Quantcast