Re: and who made god?
From: Allan C Cybulskie (allan.c.cybulskie_at_yahoo.ca)
Date: 01/22/05
- Next message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian"
- Previous message: Christopher A. Lee: "Re: OT: An interesting snippet about proof of God's Existence."
- In reply to: Mani Deli: "Re: and who made god?"
- Next in thread: The Sophist: "Re: and who made god?"
- Reply: The Sophist: "Re: and who made god?"
- Reply: Mani Deli: "Re: and who made god?"
- Reply: Anthony Cerrato: "Re: and who made god?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 13:49:47 -0500
"Mani Deli" <mani@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:d462v0doacm9nrncetsadass63n8drkjdo@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:26:18 -0500, "Allan C Cybulskie"
> <allan.c.cybulskie@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>
>
> >> Whatever way you cut it "intelligent
> >> design" is wholly dependent on Bible Babble.
> >
> >Again, read Kant.
>
> Has nothing to do with so called intelligent design.
Then you have no idea what he actually wrote in "The Critique of Pure
Reason"
>
>
> > He makes no reference to the Bible at all in arguing
> >for -- and against -- intelligent design.
>
> Neither does Abbot and Costello.
I didn't realize that they had published any philosophical papers. Can you
reference any?
It's clear at this point that you are posting to a philosophy newsgroup and
have no idea who Immanuel Kant is. Hang your head in shame.
>
> > And, in fact, the argument from
> >design relies entirely on empirical observation,
>
> Name One. Bet he won't answer.
One that I found interesting is the fact that most liquids, when they
freeze, are heavier than their liquid forms and so would sink to the bottom
when frozen. One notable exception is water, which gets lighter when frozen
and so floats on the top of the liquid form -- a quality that is totally
necessary for -- at least -- aquatic life.
Yes, it could happen at random and if it hadn't we just wouldn't have
aquatic life ... but it is an empirical result that appears designed.
>
> > and not on the Bible at
> >all. It's only at the end of the argument that anyone can point to the
> >entity given in the Bible and say "This guy looks likea good candidate
for
> >that intelligent designer."
>
> That's why its Bible Babble. Its all one can point to.
The problem is that you do not need to point at the Bible to hold the
argument.
- Next message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian"
- Previous message: Christopher A. Lee: "Re: OT: An interesting snippet about proof of God's Existence."
- In reply to: Mani Deli: "Re: and who made god?"
- Next in thread: The Sophist: "Re: and who made god?"
- Reply: The Sophist: "Re: and who made god?"
- Reply: Mani Deli: "Re: and who made god?"
- Reply: Anthony Cerrato: "Re: and who made god?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|