Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics
From: robert j. kolker (nowhere_at_nowhere.net)
Date: 01/23/05
- Next message: Barb Knox: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Previous message: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- In reply to: George Cox: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Next in thread: Barb Knox: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Reply: Barb Knox: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Reply: George Cox: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:27:17 -0500
George Cox wrote:
>
> Also mathematics goes beyond tautologies: not every theorem of first
> order logic is a tautology.
Give us a closed wff in FOL which is a theorem and not true under all
interpretations.
Bob Kolker
- Next message: Barb Knox: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Previous message: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- In reply to: George Cox: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Next in thread: Barb Knox: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Reply: Barb Knox: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Reply: George Cox: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|