Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH **********
From: |-|erc (H_at_r.c)
Date: 01/24/05
- Next message: |-|erc: "Re: Why we cannot compute omega"
- Previous message: rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Why we cannot compute omega"
- In reply to: rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com: "Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH **********"
- Next in thread: rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com: "Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH **********"
- Reply: rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com: "Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH **********"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 13:57:38 +1000
<rupertmccallum@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> Yes they would, and anyway this is irrelevant. The question is whether
> or not you understand it.
>
liar
Herc
- Next message: |-|erc: "Re: Why we cannot compute omega"
- Previous message: rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Why we cannot compute omega"
- In reply to: rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com: "Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH **********"
- Next in thread: rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com: "Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH **********"
- Reply: rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com: "Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH **********"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
