Random reals are not computable!
examachine_at_gmail.com
Date: 01/25/05
- Next message: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity"
- Previous message: Pastor Frank: "Re: OT: An interesting snippet about proof of God's Existence."
- In reply to: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: Why we cannot compute omega"
- Next in thread: Mike Oliver: "Re: Random reals are not computable!"
- Reply: Mike Oliver: "Re: Random reals are not computable!"
- Reply: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Random reals are not computable!"
- Reply: Daryl McCullough: "Re: Random reals are not computable!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 25 Jan 2005 05:35:23 -0800
The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
> In sci.logic, examachine@gmail.com
> <examachine@gmail.com>
> wrote
> on 24 Jan 2005 06:22:07 -0800
> <1106576527.401408.268510@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>:
> > Well, Omega is a random number by definition like any probability,
e.g.
> > it's in (0,1). If you believe that real numbers exist, then it
wouldn't
> > be so hard to believe that Omega, too, exists :)
>
> Pedant point: Omega is not random. It's just not computable. :-)
> Though we should be able to get close via various heuristics.
To be pedantic, Omega *is* random.
A real number is random iff it is not computable. You say it's
uncomputable but not random. There are no such numbers. There is a
theorem for that!!!!
That a random number is definable in some mathematical framework like
information theory does not mean that it is not random.
That a random number is semi-computable (to use the terminology of an
expert in Kolmogorov complexity: Paul Vitanyi) does not mean that it is
not random.
Omega is random by any criterion of randomness, e.g. Solovay
randomness, etc.
If you don't believe me, read Chaitin's monograph and find out the
proofs yourself.
Regards,
-- Eray OZkural
- Next message: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Metaphysics of Potential Infinity"
- Previous message: Pastor Frank: "Re: OT: An interesting snippet about proof of God's Existence."
- In reply to: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: Why we cannot compute omega"
- Next in thread: Mike Oliver: "Re: Random reals are not computable!"
- Reply: Mike Oliver: "Re: Random reals are not computable!"
- Reply: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Random reals are not computable!"
- Reply: Daryl McCullough: "Re: Random reals are not computable!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|