Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones"
tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu
Date: 01/29/05
- Next message: Keith A. Lewis: "Re: So you want APPROACHABLE oo, REAL oo, INTEGER oo, COUNTABLE oo, HIGHER oo, MEGA oo's"
- Previous message: Mike Oliver: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Next in thread: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Reply: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Reply: Aatu Koskensilta: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Reply: r.e.s.: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Reply: george: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Reply: |-|erc: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Reply: William Elliot: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Maybe reply: Helene.Boucher_at_wanadoo.fr: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 29 Jan 2005 20:00:28 GMT
The Church-Turing thesis is familiar to many people, largely because it
has been widely discussed both in textbooks and in popular science writing.
Having a name helps, too.
There is an analogous thesis that is relevant to logic and the foundations
of mathematics:
(*) Formal sentences (in PA or ZFC for example) adequately express
their informal counterparts.
Years of discussion, on USENET and elsewhere, has convinced me that the
average level of understanding of foundational issues would be enormously
improved if (*) were, like the Church-Turing thesis, given a name and
widely discussed.
As matters stand today, a lot of people don't seem to even acknowledge the
existence of informal mathematical discourse, despite the fact that all but
a tiny fraction of mathematical discourse they've ever seen is informal (in
the sense of (*)).
At a somewhat more sophisticated level, I can testify that my own ability
to grasp intermediate-level concepts such as the proof of the reflection
theorem and Rosser-style proof predicates would have been improved if I had
already had a firm grasp of the significance of (*).
Any candidates for a catchy name for (*)?
-- Tim Chow tchow-at-alum-dot-mit-dot-edu The range of our projectiles---even ... the artillery---however great, will never exceed four of those miles of which as many thousand separate us from the center of the earth. ---Galileo, Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences
- Next message: Keith A. Lewis: "Re: So you want APPROACHABLE oo, REAL oo, INTEGER oo, COUNTABLE oo, HIGHER oo, MEGA oo's"
- Previous message: Mike Oliver: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Next in thread: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Reply: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Reply: Aatu Koskensilta: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Reply: r.e.s.: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Reply: george: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Reply: |-|erc: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Reply: William Elliot: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Maybe reply: Helene.Boucher_at_wanadoo.fr: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|