Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones"
From: Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta_at_xortec.fi)
Date: 01/29/05
- Next message: mareg_at_mimosa.csv.warwick.ac.uk: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Previous message: tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- In reply to: tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu: "Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Next in thread: r.e.s.: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 22:32:57 +0200
tchow@lsa.umich.edu wrote:
> The Church-Turing thesis is familiar to many people, largely because it
> has been widely discussed both in textbooks and in popular science writing.
> Having a name helps, too.
>
> There is an analogous thesis that is relevant to logic and the foundations
> of mathematics:
>
> (*) Formal sentences (in PA or ZFC for example) adequately express
> their informal counterparts.
Erhm. What is the informal counterpart of a randomly chosen formal
sentence, in the language of arithmetic or in the language of set
theory? Do arbitrarily complex formal sentences have informal
counterparts? How do we know this?
It seems that the following very vaguely formulated thesis is more
strongly supported by the evidence we have, and more relevant to
applications:
(*) Every informal mathematical statement can be given a faithful
formal rendition in a suitably chosen formal language and relevant
background theory
I'm not at all convinced that all sentences of, say, the language of
arithmetic have informal counterparts if by informal counterparti we're
supposed to mean anything more substantial than "for every natural
number x there exists a natural number y such that for all natural
numbers z there exists a natural number w such that for all natural
numbers u ..."
-- Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xortec.fi) "Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber muss man schweigen" - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
- Next message: mareg_at_mimosa.csv.warwick.ac.uk: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Previous message: tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- In reply to: tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu: "Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Next in thread: r.e.s.: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|