Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones"
Helene.Boucher_at_wanadoo.fr
Date: 01/30/05
- Next message: Helene.Boucher_at_wanadoo.fr: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Previous message: Arthur Fischer: "Re: My claim on Omega's defn"
- In reply to: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Next in thread: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Reply: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 30 Jan 2005 07:03:31 -0800
(1) Why this raises "basic questions" is for you to elucidate.
(2) Because it is trivially true that 2^n exists for every n.
(3) Why is it triviallly true?
(4) That's one of the 'basic questions'.
Hardy har har ! So your elucidation why something raises basic
questions (such as "Why is it trivially true that 2^n exists for every
n?") is the statement that "Because it is trivially true that 2^n
exists for every n."
Well done ! You've constructed your own vicious circle !
- Next message: Helene.Boucher_at_wanadoo.fr: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Previous message: Arthur Fischer: "Re: My claim on Omega's defn"
- In reply to: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Next in thread: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Reply: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Loading