Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones"

From: Torkel Franzen (torkel_at_sm.luth.se)
Date: 01/30/05 

Date: 30 Jan 2005 17:26:22 +0100

Helene.Boucher@wanadoo.fr writes:

> I therefore do not
> understand your comments, since they do not appear to have any
> relevance.

  I was responding to your statement that "..your additional phrase
answers the question 'Why is it trivially true...?'...".

> What I meant was: if S1 and S2 are only equivalent supposing that some
> other proposition is true, then they cannot be intensionally
> equivalent.

  So what do you take "intensionally equivalent" to mean?