Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE OMEGA ? ***********
From: fishfry (BLOCKSPAMfishfry_at_your-mailbox.com)
Date: 01/30/05
- Next message: alex goldman: "Re: higher-order logic"
- Previous message: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- In reply to: |-|erc: "******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE OMEGA ? ***********"
- Next in thread: |-|erc: "Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE OMEGA ? ***********"
- Reply: |-|erc: "Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE OMEGA ? ***********"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:21:55 -0800
In article <362u69F4tgn7dU1@individual.net>, "|-|erc" <H@r.c> wrote:
> KEEP IGNORING MY BREAKTHROUGHS SCI.MATH
> REAL SHOWMANSHIP.. NONE OF YOU HAVE ANY BALLS TO ADMIT AN ERROR
>
> All it's going to take is one clever journalist to expose the mathematics
> community
> as the super hyped lying deceitful fools, the biggest mass of SHEEP in
> history who
> use every MOB tactic in the book and don't know a number from a doorknob.
You and Harris seem to share this view.
- Next message: alex goldman: "Re: higher-order logic"
- Previous message: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Name the thesis: "Formal sentences capture informal ones""
- In reply to: |-|erc: "******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE OMEGA ? ***********"
- Next in thread: |-|erc: "Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE OMEGA ? ***********"
- Reply: |-|erc: "Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE OMEGA ? ***********"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|