Re: WWHHOOOOO YEEEEHHHHHH
From: The Ghost In The Machine (ewill_at_sirius.athghost7038suus.net)
Date: 01/30/05
- Next message: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? ***********"
- Previous message: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: So you want APPROACHABLE oo, REAL oo, INTEGER oo, COUNTABLE oo, HIGHER oo, MEGA oo's"
- In reply to: |-|erc: "WWHHOOOOO YEEEEHHHHHH"
- Next in thread: |-|erc: "Re: WWHHOOOOO YEEEEHHHHHH"
- Reply: |-|erc: "Re: WWHHOOOOO YEEEEHHHHHH"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 19:00:10 GMT
In sci.logic, |-|erc
<H@r.c>
wrote
on Sun, 30 Jan 2005 22:43:41 +1000
<36436mF4tll4mU1@individual.net>:
> 2 days running without having to read Will lying his ass off
> in his personal logico flatulant dialect.
You can read me, instead. :-P
Is 1/3 in {.3, .33, .333, ... }? Is 3 a multiple of 10? [*]
Does card(P(S)) > card(S) for any set S?
Is R countable?
[.sigsnip]
[*] if one prefers, one can define
S_17 = {floor(10^n)/(17 * 10^n): n in J, n >= 0} and
then ask whether 1/17 is in S_17. This may clear up
some of the issues regarding digits, digit positions,
and set inclusion.
The first few elements of S_17 are
.0
.05
.058
.0588
.05882
.058823
...
-- #191, ewill3@earthlink.net It's still legal to go .sigless.
- Next message: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? ***********"
- Previous message: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: So you want APPROACHABLE oo, REAL oo, INTEGER oo, COUNTABLE oo, HIGHER oo, MEGA oo's"
- In reply to: |-|erc: "WWHHOOOOO YEEEEHHHHHH"
- Next in thread: |-|erc: "Re: WWHHOOOOO YEEEEHHHHHH"
- Reply: |-|erc: "Re: WWHHOOOOO YEEEEHHHHHH"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]