Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? ***********
From: r.e.s. (r.s_at_ZZmindspring.com)
Date: 01/31/05
- Next message: |-|erc: "Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? ***********"
- Previous message: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: WWHHOOOOO YEEEEHHHHHH"
- In reply to: |-|erc: "Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? ***********"
- Next in thread: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? ***********"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 04:25:13 GMT
"|-|erc" <H@r.c> wrote ...
> You have no definition for a real valued Omega.
What, specifically, is it that you don't understand
about my clarification of the definition at MathWorld
(given earlier in this thread)? Please quote the part
that's giving you trouble.
--r.e.s.
- Next message: |-|erc: "Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? ***********"
- Previous message: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: WWHHOOOOO YEEEEHHHHHH"
- In reply to: |-|erc: "Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? ***********"
- Next in thread: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? ***********"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|