Re: sketch of PROOF OF COUNTABLE REALS
From: |-|erc (h_at_r.c)
Date: 02/02/05
- Next message: |-|erc: "Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals"
- Previous message: Robert Low: "Re: a well known question"
- In reply to: rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com: "Re: sketch of PROOF OF COUNTABLE REALS"
- Next in thread: Will Twentyman: "Re: sketch of PROOF OF COUNTABLE REALS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:55:17 +1000
<rupertmccallum@yahoo.com> wrote in
> I thought you were putting forth the list of computable reals as your
> countable list of all real numbers. What list are you putting forward?
> What does "representable" mean?
Given (*), all well defined formula can be expressed in a single finite alphabet
and are countable.
Computable reals are a subset of this list, as
"UTM( 123, digit) mod 10" is some sentence
"UTM( 124, digit) mod 10" is some sentence
Not only are all the computable reals covered UTM(n e N, ..) but
"antidiag(UTM(n e N, digit) mod 10)" is also a real that it counts.
Herc
- Next message: |-|erc: "Re: Idiocy of Muckenheim was Re: countability of reals"
- Previous message: Robert Low: "Re: a well known question"
- In reply to: rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com: "Re: sketch of PROOF OF COUNTABLE REALS"
- Next in thread: Will Twentyman: "Re: sketch of PROOF OF COUNTABLE REALS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|