The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian

From: SDR (sdrodrian_at_sdrodrian.com)
Date: 02/03/05

  • Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian" 
    Date: 2 Feb 2005 20:16:39 -0800

    >From: robert j. kolker (nowhere@nowhere.net)
    >Subject: Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian
    >Newsgroups: sci.physics, gac.physics.astronomy, sci.astro,
    >alt.astronomy, alt.sci.physics
    >Date: 2005-02-02 08:48:24 PST
    >SDR wrote:
    >>
    >> General relativity describes perfectly the way "universal gravitation"
    >> shapes the universe... GR simply does not explain exactly what
    >> "gravity" is (and that's where I come in).

    >And neither has anything else. Gravitation is an observable fact. Its
    >explanations and causes are hypothetical. What counts are the
    >predictions made from those hypothetical causes and laws. If the
    >predictions are good, all is well. If not, not.

    Dear Bob, not everybody is like you--Perhaps you're an architect
    and your only interest is in a few lines & curves, and how well
    they work in making rabbit hutches. But most scientists get into
    their life's quest because they want to know the reasons for things.
    It was a startling departure when physics first began to abandon
    its duty to explain why it is that things are the way they are, and
    became, as you state so impertinently, content to describe things
    as they appear (and where that leads things). But I can assure you
    that IF physics could explain the reason why things are they way
    they are... it would.

    There is no end to theoreticians' attempts to do this. But they are
    hampered (tied) by having to begin from a fundamentally erroneous
    assumption (that the universe is filled with fundamental/absolute
    objects which are expanding in an absolute way). But I give them
    gobs of Brownie points for their brave attempts nonetheless [there
    is out there, as we speak, a new theory that inertia is caused by
    real particles crashing against virtual particles (and naturally the
    faster real particles move the more virtual particles they crash
    against increasing mass, etc.), truly amazingly clever/inventive
    stuff, although just as amazingly pathetically silly... don't they
    have to account for the inertia of the virtual particles, or is this
    another solution where the laws of physics (Newton) cease to
    work for the benefit of making the theory elegant?]. Same thing
    with all those dimensions/branes which sustain ours (why hasn't
    this proposal shifted the question of where our dimension came
    from to where/how all those other dimensions/branes came from
    --if you're asking where it all came from and your answer is "God"
    hasn't the onus shifted to where does God come from?...

    >You have no more valid idea of the basic causes of gravitation than the
    >smartest physicists who have ever lived. Bob Kolker

    Trust me for a little while (how long can it take to read a mere
    10,000 words), and learn the real solution once & for all. Go thou:

    http://physics.sdrodrian.com

    Look, a basic postulate of the theory of General Relativity is that "a
    uniform gravitational field (like that near the Earth) is equivalent to
    a uniform acceleration." Well my text, for the first time ever explains
    how/why/what/where the acceleration (that "is" gravity) comes from, what
    it is. And why it is an inevitable result of our reality. Read & learn.

    I shall be glad to answer any question you have. I know a lot
    of stuff, you know... what women really want... you name it. Just
    hurry: I'm only for a while.

    S D Rodrian
    http://poems.sdrodrian.com
    http://physics.sdrodrian.com
    http://ar.sdrodrian.com
    http://music.sdrodrian.com

  • Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian"

    Relevant Pages

    • The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian
      ... >> shapes the universe... ... It was startling departure when physics first began to abandon ... real particles crashing against virtual particles (and naturally the ... Bob Kolker ...
      (sci.physics)
    • The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian
      ... >> shapes the universe... ... It was startling departure when physics first began to abandon ... real particles crashing against virtual particles (and naturally the ... Bob Kolker ...
      (sci.astro)
    • The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian
      ... >> shapes the universe... ... It was a startling departure when physics first began to abandon ... real particles crashing against virtual particles (and naturally the ... Bob Kolker ...
      (sci.physics.relativity)
    • The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian
      ... >> shapes the universe... ... It was a startling departure when physics first began to abandon ... real particles crashing against virtual particles (and naturally the ... Bob Kolker ...
      (sci.physics.particle)
    • Re: Taking Apart Quantum Mechanics, etc.
      ... how do you take apart Quantum Mechanics ... Because our present QM and physics has not much ... It's just another way of saying that virtual particles ... >> the entire problems of physics via the Aether Model. ...
      (sci.physics)
    • Quantcast