Re: A science-president giving the State of the Union speech; help with a term-concept

From: MrPepper11 (MrPepper11_at_go.com)
Date: 02/03/05 

Date: 3 Feb 2005 10:49:38 -0800

Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> I please need help on a term to describe a concept. The idea that
human
> population is the greatest single factor shaping history. The idea
that
> wars are primarily caused from overpopulation, albeit there are other
> factors but the single largest factor is group A has too many humans
and
> will thence wage war on group B.
>
> Listening to the state of the union speech tonight with its lofty and
> idealistic theme of freedom and democracy. I need a science biology
term
> for that of bringing babies into a world when the environment and
niche
> in social life warrant it. A term that makes couples and females not
> greedy to pollute the world with more people than they can raise in a
> decent life. Whenever we see a family in Africa we see women with 7
to
> 10 kids and no food and no future. When we see a family in Mexico
about
> to illegally immigrate into the USA we see them with 6 to 9 kids.
When
> we see poor people in India or China we see them with 5 to 7 kids.
>
> I need a term of biology, that parents can see their environment,
their
> niche and their society and to take responsibility to not have any
kids
> if they cannot give them a minimal standard of living.
>
> The Palestinians are at war with the Israelis, and thus the
Palestinians
> have one of the highest birth rates in the world. People at war
produce
> kids. Mexico is at war with the USA for it overpollutes their land
with
> more kids than they can care for and thus they illegally invade the
USA.
>
> Earth can sustain about 3 billion humans on renewable energy. And if
> Earth had only 3 billion humans now, there would be virtually no wars
> and all would be at peace. And there would not be a global warming
> threat. And the animals on the endangered or extinction list would
> stabilize and rebound.
>
> So, as Mr. Bush gives the state of the union speech, he is mostly
> talking about further greed and further erosion and destruction of
this
> planet. When he says that freedom and democracy should be on the rise
> throughout the world, does he mean that women have the freedom to
have
> as many kids as they feel like it? Does he mean by freedom that human
> population should rise to 8 billion then 9 then 10 then 11 then 12
> billion?
>
> When this planet reaches more billions of people from its already 7
> billion then terrorism increases, then a nuclear war increases, then
the
> extinction of all animals larger than the size of a dog in the wild
is
> assured, then global warming intensifies and vast ecosystems are
> destroyed, then diseases and plagues increase.
>
> As human overpopulation increases then living standards decrease
rapidly
> and not just for the middle and lower classes but every class.
>
> Since freedom contradicts planned parenthood where laws are enacted
that
> you need permission and license to have a child born and where women
are
> limited in how many babies they can have. So the message of a State
of
> the Union that is more in tune with this 21st century is one not of
> freedom and democracy but one of calling upon the world to freeze
human
> populations and to have laws limiting the number of children born.
>
> Instead of a International Court for war crimes and inhumanity there
> should be a Court that freezed human populations and limits the
number
> of births.
>
> The past 2 centuries of the USA history have not been much about
freedom
> but mostly a long list of Greed. Simply look at the Budget Deficit.
> Simply look at Social Security where people on SS nowadays make more
> money then when they were actually working. I know of many people who
> make more money from SS then when they were in the workplace.
>
> Some French philosopher said that Democracy works only until the
people
> find how to vote money into their pockets and that day of reckoning
will
> come to the USA in the 21st century. So Democracy fails in the
economics
> arena but it also fails in the "clear thinking arena" as was noticed
in
> the 2004 election that religion can win the highest office of
> government. So the French philosopher may have missed a important
> destructive factor of a democracy in that religion takes over and
> destroys the system via its bigotry and inflexibility to let science
> decide major political issues.
>
> So in the STate of the Union of February 2005, if I or a scientist
> president had given the speech would call for a new term of politics
> something of a biological ring such as Environmental Niche. Please
help
> me out for this term. It would call for a revamp of Social Security
for
> it is too generous. It would call for a law set in place that a woman
is
> limited to the number of babies. It would call for a physical barrier
> such as what Israel is putting up, only here the USA put up around
the
> Mexican border. Unless the USA does some drastic about Mexico, then
the
> USA will be spanish speaking in the next century and all white
property
> expropriated much the same as in Zimbabwe. The case with Mexico is
much
> more serious than just guest workers and jobs that Yanks will not do.
> Unless the USA realizes the gravity of the problem, then Mexico will
> outnumber Yanks and take over the USA.
>
> Instead of freedom and democracy as goals of the 21st century, we
need a
> newer and higher and better goal. We need to realize in this century
> that planet EArth is small and that our human overpopulation is
ruining
> it. That we need to control population to control pollution and
global
> warming. What good is it for poor starving disease ridden jobless
people
> to go to a poll to vote? And as long as populations increase,
terrorism
> increases. If we control population then everyone borne is a wanted
> child and family will be concerned that they do not turn to violence
and
> antisocial.
>
> So in the 21st century, our new goal is "planned parenthood". Clean
> environment and jobs for everyone borne. A Earth that has room for
all
> wild animals and not another 4 billion more humans on top of the
already
> 7 billion. A planet of people that can sustain itself on renewable
> energy.
>
> So instead of grasping of the 19th and 20th century platitude of
Freedom
> and Democracy, we live in a new world of the 21st century where our
goal
> is to make living and life on Earth for every human that of a clean
> environment, peace, and job and prosperity. Of which none can be
> realized unless human population is controlled and limited.
>
> So what the world needs foremost is legal laws freezing human
> populations and limiting the number of children per woman.
>
> Human overpopulation is the number one biggest evil and unless it is
> controlled all other evils will be a consequence of overpopulation.
>
> Archimedes Plutonium
> www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
> whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
> of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

The biology term for it?? SEX.

The rationale behind it is pure self-interest. Very hard to change in
primitive societies where personal survival and/or success is measured
by fertility (in turn a measure of virility).

Solutions guaranteed to work: Nuclear war, plague, a comet strike,
coerced mass sterilizations. For now, we need BORDER CONTROL.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: News Release
    ... In a democracy the people has to control what the state does. ... where law and order counts for everyone, and everyone can count on it. ... them were caught during a war, on the fiels of battle not ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: News Release
    ... In a democracy the people has to control what the state does. ... where law and order counts for everyone, and everyone can count on it. ... The war we fight is ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • A science-president giving the State of the Union speech; help with a term-concept
    ... to illegally immigrate into the USA we see them with 6 to 9 kids. ... The Palestinians are at war with the Israelis, ... When he says that freedom and democracy should be on the rise ...
    (sci.logic)
  • OT- Why Dems supported war in Bosnia and not Iraq
    ... Why Dems Supported War In Bosnia But Not Iraq ... that democracy is in no way superior to any other form of government, ... Arguments such as "one cannot impose freedom" and the laughable ...
    (sci.med.diseases.lyme)
  • LETTER TO PRESIDENT BUSH
    ... the freedom fighters are happy to fight under your leadership ... We will mainly focus on the present war and its main issues. ... dictatorships and lack of democracy are the main causes of terrorism. ... opposition in an increasing number of countries. ...
    (soc.culture.indonesia)