Re: Ponzi or Pyramid Schemes
From: tg (tgdenning_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 02/25/05
- Next message: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- In reply to: Immortalist: "Re: Ponzi or Pyramid Schemes"
- Next in thread: Immortalist: "Re: Ponzi or Pyramid Schemes"
- Reply: Immortalist: "Re: Ponzi or Pyramid Schemes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 25 Feb 2005 13:40:31 -0800
*A* pig does not become an elephant by eating everything in sight.
*Pigs* do not evolve into elephants when they are successful, they stay
pigs. Natural selection is essentially a conservative mechanism.
To cut and paste myself:
"These systems are self-regulating and so do not suffer catastrophic
failure except from
external or random events. Capitalism relies on continued growth, which
is the nature of a Ponzi scheme."
Note "extermal or random events". Evolution is what happens when
conditions change.
-tg
- Next message: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- In reply to: Immortalist: "Re: Ponzi or Pyramid Schemes"
- Next in thread: Immortalist: "Re: Ponzi or Pyramid Schemes"
- Reply: Immortalist: "Re: Ponzi or Pyramid Schemes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|