Re: the logical argument behind equation solving??
From: futurist (adamgolding_at_adamgolding.com)
Date: 02/27/05
- Next message: Arturo Magidin: "Re: proving bicondtionals without cases?"
- Previous message: futurist: "proving bicondtionals without cases?"
- In reply to: Randy Poe: "Re: the logical argument behind equation solving??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 26 Feb 2005 16:19:32 -0800
ahh, ok, i've heard these sets referred to as 'truth sets'--but where
does this S operator come from (historically, and where is it used
today) and why do you change cases on P and Q?
- Next message: Arturo Magidin: "Re: proving bicondtionals without cases?"
- Previous message: futurist: "proving bicondtionals without cases?"
- In reply to: Randy Poe: "Re: the logical argument behind equation solving??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
