sci.logic
By Thread

1179 messages sorted by: [ date ]

Starting: 02/28/05
Ending: 03/30/05

Why Relativity must be wrong… sc_martin (03/30/05)
Q_What_does_this_symbol_mean=3F?= Ben (03/29/05)
Monadic 2nd Order Logic Wormie (03/29/05)
G.H.Hardy gave an invalid proof of Infinitude of Primes in "A Mathematician's Apology" Archimedes Plutonium (03/29/05)
- Re: G.H.Hardy gave an invalid proof of Infinitude of Primes in "A Mathematician's Apology" Nathan (03/29/05)
- Re: G.H.Hardy gave an invalid proof of Infinitude of Primes in "A Mathematician's Apology" Arthur Fischer (03/29/05)
  - Re: G.H.Hardy gave an invalid proof of Infinitude of Primes in "AMathematician's Apology" Archimedes Plutonium (03/29/05)
    - Re: G.H.Hardy gave an invalid proof of Infinitude of Primes in "AMathematician's Apology" tomlewton1_at_hotmail.com (03/29/05)
    - Re: G.H.Hardy gave an invalid proof of Infinitude of Primes in "AMathematician's Apology" sttscitrans_at_tesco.net (03/29/05)
  - Re: G.H.Hardy gave an invalid proof of Infinitude of Primes in "A Mathematician's Apology" Timothy Little (03/29/05)
- Re: G.H.Hardy gave an invalid proof of Infinitude of Primes in "A Mathematician's Apology" Abraham Buckingham (03/29/05)
  - Re: G.H.Hardy gave an invalid proof of Infinitude of Primes in "A Mathematician's Apology" sttscitrans_at_tesco.net (03/29/05)
  - Re: G.H.Hardy gave an invalid proof of Infinitude of Primes in "A Mathematician's Apology" Archimedes Plutonium (03/30/05)
corrected Infinitude of Primes proof; both direct and indirect methods Archimedes Plutonium (03/29/05)
- essence of the correction Re: corrected Infinitude of Primes proof; both direct and indirect methods Archimedes Plutonium (03/29/05)
  - Re: essence of the correction Re: corrected Infinitude of Primes proof; both direct and indirect methods Alec McKenzie (03/29/05)
    - Re: essence of the correction Re: corrected Infinitude of Primes proof; both direct and indirect methods Archimedes Plutonium (03/29/05)
Euclid never gave a indirect proof of Infinitude of Primes; his proof was direct Archimedes Plutonium (03/29/05)
14 sets, 14 modalities, epistemic logic, Cantor spaces and an Euler tour mitch (03/29/05)
- Re: 14 sets, 14 modalities, epistemic logic, Cantor spaces and an Euler tour William Elliot (03/29/05)
  - Re: 14 sets, 14 modalities, epistemic logic, Cantor spaces and an Euler tour mitch (03/30/05)
Question about higher order computability... Snis Pilbor (03/28/05)
- Re: Question about higher order computability... H. Enderton (03/29/05)
  - Re: Question about higher order computability... Snis Pilbor (03/29/05)
- re:Question about higher order computability... muxol (03/30/05)
Nazi Probe extended for two years Barbara Schwarz (03/28/05)
U.S. Department of Justice Virtual Library is not available to the public Barbara Schwarz (03/28/05)
EOUSA has chosen to follow path of secrecy and obfuscation Barbara Schwarz (03/28/05)
Re: Wolfram's MathWorld fails to give a valid proof of Euclid'sInfinitude of Primes Archimedes Plutonium (03/28/05)
- Re: Wolfram's MathWorld fails to give a valid proof of Euclid'sInfinitude of Primes sttscitrans_at_tesco.net (03/28/05)
  - Re: Wolfram's MathWorld fails to give a valid proof of Euclid'sInfinitude of Primes Timothy (03/28/05)
    - Re: Wolfram's MathWorld fails to give a valid proof of Euclid'sInfinitude of Primes Dave Seaman (03/28/05)
Wolfram's MathWorld fails to give a valid proof of Euclid's Infinitude of Primes Archimedes Plutonium (03/27/05)
- Re: Wolfram's MathWorld fails to give a valid proof of Euclid's Infinitude of Primes Stan Liou (03/27/05)
  - Re: Wolfram's MathWorld fails to give a valid proof of Euclid's Infinitude of Primes The Ghost In The Machine (03/28/05)
    - Re: Wolfram's MathWorld fails to give a valid proof of Euclid's Infinitude of Primes Archimedes Plutonium (03/30/05)
  - Re: Wolfram's MathWorld fails to give a valid proof of Euclid's Infinitude of Primes Archimedes Plutonium (03/28/05)
Correcting the invalid proof attempts of Euclid's Infinitude of Primes, both direct and indirect methods Archimedes Plutonium (03/27/05)
- Re: Correcting the invalid proof attempts of Euclid's Infinitude of Primes, both direct and indirect methods Giuseppe Bilotta (03/27/05)
  - Re: Correcting the invalid proof attempts of Euclid's Infinitude of Primes, both direct and indirect methods Archimedes Plutonium (03/28/05)
- Re: Correcting the invalid proof attempts of Euclid's Infinitude of Primes, both direct and indirect methods sttscitrans_at_tesco.net (03/27/05)
- Re: Correcting the invalid proof attempts of Euclid's Infinitude of Primes, both direct and indirect methods sttscitrans_at_tesco.net (03/27/05)
- Re: Correcting the invalid proof attempts of Euclid's Infinitude of Primes, both direct and indirect methods Archimedes Plutonium (03/28/05)
  - Re: Correcting the invalid proof attempts of Euclid's Infinitude of Primes, both direct and indirect methods sttscitrans_at_tesco.net (03/28/05)
Artificial Intelligence solved ?? Yeah sure,not exactly !! Malin (03/27/05)
Re: What is wrong with this argument? Woden (03/26/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Doc Smartass (03/26/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Denis Loubet (03/26/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? grazer (03/26/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? David Vestal (03/26/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? L. Raymond (03/26/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? sAnToLiNa (03/27/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? graham (03/27/05)
  - Re: What is wrong with this argument? David H. (03/27/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Desertphile, American Patriot (03/27/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Virgil (03/27/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Dale (03/27/05)
  - Re: What is wrong with this argument? Desertphile, American Patriot (03/27/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Milan (03/27/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? yõwïe (03/27/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Bobby D. Bryant (03/27/05)
  - Re: What is wrong with this argument? Michelle Malkin (03/27/05)
  - Re: What is wrong with this argument? Christopher A. Lee (03/27/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Ike (03/27/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Nivlem (03/27/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Douglas Berry (03/27/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Gavan (03/27/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Denis Loubet (03/27/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? kathryn (03/27/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? kathryn (03/27/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? John Baker (03/27/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Robibnikoff (03/27/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Robibnikoff (03/27/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Robibnikoff (03/27/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Robibnikoff (03/27/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Robibnikoff (03/27/05)
  - Re: What is wrong with this argument? kathryn (03/27/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? MarkA (03/27/05)
  - Re: What is wrong with this argument? MsAnthrope (03/27/05)
  - Re: What is wrong with this argument? Desertphile, American Patriot (03/27/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Desertphile, American Patriot (03/27/05)
  - Re: What is wrong with this argument? The Ghost In The Machine (03/27/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? pan (03/27/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Robibnikoff (03/27/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Robibnikoff (03/27/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Pavel314 (03/27/05)
  - Re: What is wrong with this argument? Incubus (03/28/05)
  - Re: What is wrong with this argument? Hector Plasmic (03/28/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Gavan (03/27/05)
  - Re: What is wrong with this argument? marvin (03/27/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? jwk (03/27/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? jwk (03/27/05)
  - Re: What is wrong with this argument? Jez (03/28/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Gavan (03/27/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? George Dance (03/28/05)
  - Re: What is wrong with this argument? Acme Diagnostics (03/28/05)
    - Re: What is wrong with this argument? George Dance (03/28/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Gavan (03/28/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? George Dance (03/28/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Earle Jones (03/28/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Gavan (03/28/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Gavan (03/28/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Hector Plasmic (03/28/05)
  - Re: What is wrong with this argument? Desertphile, American Patriot (03/28/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? 666interface (03/29/05)
  - Re: What is wrong with this argument? Sweet Ol' Bob (03/29/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Gavan (03/29/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Elroy Willis (03/29/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Elroy Willis (03/29/05)
  - Re: What is wrong with this argument? Sweet Ol' Bob (03/29/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Sweet Ol' Bob (03/29/05)
  - Re: What is wrong with this argument? Robibnikoff (03/29/05)
  - Re: What is wrong with this argument? Elroy Willis (03/29/05)
    - Re: What is wrong with this argument? Sweet Ol' Bob (03/29/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Robibnikoff (03/29/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Robibnikoff (03/29/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Robibnikoff (03/29/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Robibnikoff (03/29/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Elroy Willis (03/29/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Sweet Ol' Bob (03/29/05)
- Re: What is wrong with this argument? Gavan (03/29/05)
Re: Proof christians are full of crap Peter Webb (03/26/05)
- Re: Proof christians are full of crap Robibnikoff (03/26/05)
  - Re: Proof christians are full of crap Peter Webb (03/27/05)
- Re: Proof christians are full of crap Fredric L. Rice (03/26/05)
- Re: Proof christians are full of crap yõwïe (03/27/05)
- Re: Proof christians are full of crap Andrew W (03/27/05)
- Re: Proof christians are full of crap Robibnikoff (03/27/05)
- Re: Proof christians are full of crap Robibnikoff (03/27/05)
- Re: Proof christians are full of crap Robibnikoff (03/27/05)
- Re: Proof christians are full of crap Robibnikoff (03/27/05)
- Re: Proof christians are full of crap Earle Jones (03/27/05)
- Re: Proof christians are full of crap Andrew W (03/27/05)
- Re: Proof christians are full of crap Fredric L. Rice (03/27/05)
- Re: Proof christians are full of crap 666interface (03/30/05)
  - Re: Proof christians are full of crap The Sophist (03/30/05)
All faggot penises are liars Maaxx (03/26/05)
- Re: Deconstruction of the argument 'All faggot penises are liars' The Ghost In The Machine (03/26/05)
  - Re: Deconstruction of the argument 'All faggot penises are liars' Babylonian (03/26/05)
    - Re: Deconstruction of the argument 'All faggot penises are liars' The Ghost In The Machine (03/27/05)
Need help to understand roots of Galois polynomials Michael (03/24/05)
- Re: Need help to understand roots of Galois polynomials Gregory G Rose (03/25/05)
- Re: Need help to understand roots of Galois polynomials Timothy Murphy (03/25/05)
- Re: Need help to understand roots of Galois polynomials jshsucks_at_yahoo.com (03/27/05)
Do we really nedd to have models for a theory? namducnguyen (03/24/05)
- Re: Do we really nedd to have models for a theory? David C. Ullrich (03/24/05)
  - Re: Do we really nedd to have models for a theory? namducnguyen (03/25/05)
  - Re: Do we really nedd to have models for a theory? george (03/25/05)
Re: Closer and closer you move to the Cantorian cliff tinyurl.com/uh3t (03/23/05)
- Re: Closer and closer you move to the Cantorian cliff Michel Hack (03/24/05)
  - Re: Closer and closer you move to the Cantorian cliff tinyurl.com/uh3t (03/26/05)
Re: TOE Via Cantor's Transfinite Arithmetic Ross A. Finlayson (03/23/05)
duality in physics, not tri-ality, implies that only Riemannian and Lobachevskian geometries exist and that Euclidean is not a geometry Archimedes Plutonium (03/21/05)
- Re: duality in physics, not tri-ality, implies that only Riemannian and Lobachevskian geometries exist and that Euclidean is not a geometry Giuseppe Bilotta (03/21/05)
- Re: duality in physics, not tri-ality, implies that only Riemannian and Lobachevskian geometries exist and that Euclidean is not a geometry Archimedes Plutonium (03/22/05)
  - Complex numbers is the ether to Newtonian Mechanics Re: duality in physics, not tri-ality, implies that only Riemannian and Lobachevskian geometries exist and that Euclidean is not a geometry Archimedes Plutonium (03/23/05)
    - Re: Complex numbers is the ether to Newtonian Mechanics Re: duality in physics, not tri-ality, implies that only Riemannian and Lobachevskian geometries exist and that Euclidean is not a geometry Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium (03/24/05)
- Re: ... only Riemannian and Lobachevskian geometries exist and that Euclidean is not a geometry Jim Spriggs (03/26/05)
Re: A question on GIT. Helene.Boucher_at_wanadoo.fr (03/20/05)
- Re: A question on GIT. Pierre Asselin (03/21/05)
  - Re: A question on GIT. Helene.Boucher_at_wanadoo.fr (03/21/05)
    - Re: A question on GIT. Helene.Boucher_at_wanadoo.fr (03/21/05)
- Re: A question on GIT. muxol (03/21/05)
Physical models of set theory Peter Webb (03/19/05)
- Re: Physical models of set theory Jim Spriggs (03/19/05)
- Re: Physical models of set theory Nam Nguyen (03/19/05)
- Re: Physical models of set theory Dan Christensen (03/19/05)
- Re: Physical models of set theory examachine_at_gmail.com (03/19/05)
- Re: Physical models of set theory dave (03/22/05)
  - Re: Physical models of set theory mitch (03/30/05)
Logic Puzzle Solver version 0.85 eyebee (03/18/05)
- Re: Logic Puzzle Solver version 0.85 eyebee (03/20/05)
Need help to find good site or article in the binary BCH Michael (03/17/05)
Competition w/ the Common Good in Mind donquijote1954 (03/17/05)
Some Simple Questions Charlie-Boo (03/17/05)
- Re: Some Simple Questions David C. Ullrich (03/17/05)
  - Re: Some Simple Questions Charlie-Boo (03/17/05)
  - Re: Some Simple Questions R-matrix (03/18/05)
- Re: Some Simple Questions Jim Spriggs (03/17/05)
  - Re: Some Simple Questions Charlie-Boo (03/17/05)
- Re: Some Simple Questions guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de (03/17/05)
  - Re: Some Simple Questions Charlie-Boo (03/17/05)
    - Re: Some Simple Questions guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de (03/17/05)
- Re: Some Simple Questions Randy Poe (03/18/05)
  - Re: Some Simple Questions Charlie-Boo (03/18/05)
- Re: Some Simple Questions Sevenhundred Elves (03/19/05)
- Re: Some Simple Questions W. Dale Hall (03/21/05)
  - Re: Some Simple Questions G. Frege (03/21/05)
Nice little total order problem. Bill Taylor (03/17/05)
- Re: Nice little total order problem. Virgil (03/17/05)
  - Re: Nice little total order problem. William Elliot (03/17/05)
- Re: Nice little total order problem. bof_at_sunflower.com (03/17/05)
in love with a theory? geraldrm_at_earthlink.net (03/16/05)
- Re: in love with a theory? john_correy_at_yahoo.com (03/21/05)
How many nuclear weapons do the Scientologists have? stevejdufour_at_yahoo.com (03/16/05)
search engine performance to a new unprecedented level nancy (03/16/05)
search engine performance to a new unprecedented level nancy (03/16/05)
- Re: search engine performance to a new unprecedented level William Elliot (03/16/05)
A Class of 3SAT Solvable in Polytime Russell Easterly (03/16/05)
Re: A science-president giving the State of the Union speech; help with a term-concept matt (03/16/05)
WISDOM of Crowds (Iden?ify -Uare the missing data) Immortalist (03/15/05)
- Re: WISDOM of Crowds (Iden?ify -Uare the missing data) Immortalist (03/15/05)
  - Re: WISDOM of Crowds (Iden?ify -Uare the missing data) Albert Wagner (03/16/05)
- Re: WISDOM of Crowds (Iden?ify -Uare the missing data) Immortalist (03/15/05)
  - Re: WISDOM of Crowds (Iden?ify -Uare the missing data) feedbackdroids_at_yahoo.com (03/16/05)
    - Re: WISDOM of Crowds (Iden?ify -Uare the missing data) Immortalist (03/16/05)
- Re: WISDOM of Crowds (Iden?ify -Uare the missing data) Immortalist (03/15/05)
- Re: WISDOM of Crowds (Iden?ify -Uare the missing data) Immortalist (03/15/05)
  - Re: WISDOM of Crowds (Iden?ify -Uare the missing data) feedbackdroids_at_yahoo.com (03/16/05)
    - Re: WISDOM of Crowds (Iden?ify -Uare the missing data) Immortalist (03/16/05)
- Re: WISDOM of Crowds (Iden?ify -Uare the missing data) Immortalist (03/15/05)
  - Re: WISDOM of Crowds (Iden?ify -Uare the missing data) Immortalist (03/15/05)
- Re: WISDOM of Crowds (Iden?ify -Uare the missing data) Sir Frederick (03/15/05)
  - Re: WISDOM of Crowds (Iden?ify -Uare the missing data) Immortalist (03/16/05)
- Re: WISDOM of Crowds (Iden?ify -Uare the missing data) Immortalist (03/15/05)
- Re: WISDOM of Crowds (Iden?ify -Uare the missing data) tooly (03/16/05)
  - Re: WISDOM of Crowds (Iden?ify -Uare the missing data) zerkanX (03/16/05)
  - Re: WISDOM of Crowds (Iden?ify -Uare the missing data) Immortalist (03/16/05)
- Re: WISDOM of Crowds (Iden?ify -Uare the missing data) zerkanX (03/16/05)
  - Re: WISDOM of Crowds (Iden?ify -Uare the missing data) Immortalist (03/16/05)
- Re: WISDOM of Crowds (Iden?ify -Uare the missing data) Chuck Brown (03/17/05)
"The Logical Mathematicians" Koral Maze (03/15/05)
- Re: "The Logical Mathematicians" Mike (03/15/05)
- Re: "The Logical Mathematicians" Christopher Allan Webber (03/15/05)
- Re: "The Logical Mathematicians" Robert Israel (03/15/05)
  - Re: "The Logical Mathematicians" Koral Maze (03/15/05)
    - Re: "The Logical Mathematicians" Robert Israel (03/15/05)
  - Re: "The Logical Mathematicians" Stefan Wehmeier (03/22/05)
- Re: "The Logical Mathematicians" Gerry Myerson (03/15/05)
- Re: "The Logical Mathematicians" spinoza1111_at_yahoo.com (03/15/05)
- Re: "The Logical Mathematicians" The Last Danish Pastry (03/15/05)
"separate entity" and individuation in mathematics mitch (03/14/05)
- Re: "separate entity" and individuation in mathematics Jim Spriggs (03/15/05)
  - Re: "separate entity" and individuation in mathematics george (03/17/05)
  - Re: "separate entity" and individuation in mathematics Russell (03/17/05)
- Re: "separate entity" and individuation in mathematics george (03/17/05)
  - Re: "separate entity" and individuation in mathematics mitch (03/20/05)
  - Re: "separate entity" and individuation in mathematics mitch (03/20/05)
"separate entity" and individuation in mathematics mitch (03/14/05)
"separate entity" and individuation in mathematics (html) mitch (03/14/05)
Effective algorithmic procedures before Church/Turing Peter_Smith (03/14/05)
- Re: Effective algorithmic procedures before Church/Turing Jim Spriggs (03/14/05)
  - Re: Effective algorithmic procedures before Church/Turing Stephen Harris (03/15/05)
On-line Godel book updated ps218_at_cam.ac.uk (03/12/05)
- Re: On-line Godel book updated William Elliot (03/12/05)
  - Re: On-line Godel book updated William Elliot (03/12/05)
- Re: On-line Godel book updated muxol (03/14/05)
  - Re: On-line Godel book updated William Elliot (03/14/05)
- re:On-line Godel book updated muxol (03/14/05)
- Re: On-line Godel book updated muxol (03/14/05)
  - Re: On-line Godel book updated Stephen Harris (03/14/05)
    - Re: On-line Godel book updated Peter_Smith (03/14/05)
  - Re: On-line Godel book updated William Elliot (03/15/05)
Lambda-calculus and Category Theory noone (03/12/05)
Before you go on.... John Ryskampp (03/11/05)
semantic nets vs first-order logic alex goldman (03/11/05)
- Re: semantic nets vs first-order logic Chris Menzel (03/11/05)
evidence that neither Jesus nor his father were carpenters a_plutonium_at_hotmail.com (03/10/05)
evidence that neither Jesus or his father was a carpenter Archimedes Plutonium (03/10/05)
- Re: evidence that neither Jesus or his father was a carpenter Dom (03/10/05)
  - Re: evidence that neither Jesus or his father was a carpenter Archimedes Plutonium (03/11/05)
- Re: evidence that neither Jesus or his father was a carpenter Sancho Pansy (03/14/05)
Re: What do you think of this story? David C. Ullrich (03/10/05)
- Re: What do you think of this story? Torkel Franzen (03/10/05)
  - Re: What do you think of this story? Babylonian (03/11/05)
- Re: What do you think of this story? Bobby D. Bryant (03/10/05)
  - Re: What do you think of this story? Daryl McCullough (03/10/05)
  - Re: What do you think of this story? Larry Huntley (03/11/05)
- Re: What do you think of this story? Will Twentyman (03/10/05)
- Re: What do you think of this story? Keith Ramsay (03/11/05)
  - Re: What do you think of this story? Jim Spriggs (03/12/05)
- Re: What do you think of this story? Nathan Gilbert (03/11/05)
- Re: What do you think of this story? Chris Menzel (03/11/05)
- Re: What do you think of this story? Matt Giwer (03/12/05)
- Re: What do you think of this story? Alan Morgan (03/12/05)
- Re: What do you think of this story? spinoza1111_at_yahoo.com (03/13/05)
evidence that Jesus was not a carpenter or carpenter's son Archimedes Plutonium (03/10/05)
If-then in Logic vs Programming R-matrix (03/09/05)
- re: If-then in Logic vs Programming Acme Diagnostics (03/09/05)
  - Re: If-then in Logic vs Programming R-matrix (03/09/05)
- Re: If-then in Logic vs Programming William Elliot (03/09/05)
- Re: If-then in Logic vs Programming David C. Ullrich (03/09/05)
  - Re: If-then in Logic vs Programming R-matrix (03/10/05)
  - Re: If-then in Logic vs Programming Charlie-Boo (03/21/05)
- Re: If-then in Logic vs Programming Will Twentyman (03/09/05)
- Re: If-then in Logic vs Programming Jim Spriggs (03/11/05)
- Re: If-then in Logic vs Programming georgedance04_at_yahoo.ca (03/12/05)
- Re: If-then in Logic vs Programming George Dance (03/12/05)
  - Re: If-then in Logic vs Programming R-matrix (03/13/05)
- Re: If-then in Logic vs Programming Charlie-Boo (03/21/05)
CFP: LICS 2005: Call for Short Presentations Alex Simpson (03/08/05)
Something I've been curious about. Chairman of the David Hilbert Appreciation Society (03/08/05)
- Re: Something I've been curious about. Mike Oliver (03/08/05)
  - Re: Something I've been curious about. James Dolan (03/09/05)
- Re: Something I've been curious about. Torkel Franzen (03/08/05)
- Re: Something I've been curious about. Ken Pledger (03/09/05)
Tautology test description and samples Alex Vinokur (03/08/05)
- Re: Tautology test description and samples William Elliot (03/08/05)
  - Re: Tautology test description and samples Alex Vinokur (03/08/05)
- Re: Tautology test description and samples muxol (03/12/05)
  - Re: Tautology test description and samples David C. Ullrich (03/12/05)
- Re: Tautology test description and samples muxol (03/12/05)
  - Re: Tautology test description and samples Chris Menzel (03/12/05)
- Re: Tautology test description and samples muxol (03/13/05)
  - Re: Tautology test description and samples David C. Ullrich (03/13/05)
- Re: Tautology test description and samples muxol (03/14/05)
  - Re: Tautology test description and samples David C. Ullrich (03/14/05)
- Re: Tautology test description and samples muxol (03/14/05)
  - Re: Tautology test description and samples Chris Menzel (03/14/05)
- Re: Tautology test description and samples muxol (03/14/05)
  - Re: Tautology test description and samples David C. Ullrich (03/14/05)
  - Re: Tautology test description and samples Chris Menzel (03/14/05)
- Re: Tautology test description and samples muxol (03/14/05)
  - Re: Tautology test description and samples Chris Menzel (03/15/05)
- Re: Tautology test description and samples muxol (03/16/05)
  - Re: Tautology test description and samples Chris Menzel (03/16/05)
  - Re: Tautology test description and samples David C. Ullrich (03/16/05)
    - Re: Tautology test description and samples Chris Menzel (03/16/05)
    - Re: Tautology test description and samples David C. Ullrich (03/17/05)
highly illogical! Bill Taylor (03/08/05)
- Re: highly illogical! Barb Knox (03/08/05)
- Re: highly illogical! Daryl McCullough (03/10/05)
  - Re: highly illogical! Mike Oliver (03/10/05)
    - Re: highly illogical! Lee Rudolph (03/10/05)
Re: highly illogical! Jim Spriggs (03/07/05)
- highly illogical! William Elliot (03/08/05)
Why an inconsistent ZF may be desirable, and should be welcome. Bhupinder Singh Anand (03/07/05)
- Re: Why an inconsistent ZF may be desirable, and should be welcome. William Elliot (03/07/05)
- Re: Why an inconsistent ZF may be desirable, and should be welcome. Babylonian (03/07/05)
- Re: Why an inconsistent ZF may be desirable, and should be welcome. Mike Oliver (03/07/05)
  - Re: Why an inconsistent ZF may be desirable, and should be welcome. Bhupinder Singh Anand (03/07/05)
- Re: Why an inconsistent ZF may be desirable, and should be welcome. Paul Holbach (03/08/05)
  - Re: Why an inconsistent ZF may be desirable, and should be welcome. Paul Holbach (03/08/05)
  - Re: Why an inconsistent ZF may be desirable, and should be welcome. Bhupinder Singh Anand (03/08/05)
Re: A New Series of Books and Software vb_at_cybertester.com (03/06/05)
I am curious about yellow. Jim Spriggs (03/05/05)
- Re: I am curious about yellow. Bill Smythe (03/05/05)
A New Series of Books and Software for Scientists, Experts, Teachers and Students Academy (03/05/05)
OT: The logical choice skearney_at_accessbee.com (03/05/05)
UCLA Logic Colloquium, Mar. 11 H. Enderton (03/05/05)
Perfect Polish space poopdeville_at_gmail.com (03/04/05)
- Re: Perfect Polish space Mike Oliver (03/05/05)
  - Re: Perfect Polish space poopdeville_at_gmail.com (03/05/05)
    - Re: Perfect Polish space Mike Oliver (03/05/05)
Strange notion of computability Daryl McCullough (03/04/05)
- Re: Strange notion of computability Keith Ramsay (03/05/05)
  - Re: Strange notion of computability Daryl McCullough (03/07/05)
Re: The definition of consciousness EL (03/03/05)
Re: English Prime ( E-Prime [To Exist or Not to Exist]) crypto_stonelock_at_hotmail.com (03/03/05)
- Re: English Prime ( E-Prime [To Exist or Not to Exist]) Mike Burke (03/08/05)
  - Re: English Prime ( E-Prime [To Exist or Not to Exist]) crypto_stonelock_at_hotmail.com (03/08/05)
Re: Ponzi or Pyramid Schemes zerkanX (03/03/05)
S4 + ZFC? Mike Carroll (03/03/05)
- Re: S4 + ZFC? J.L. Perez-de-la-Cruz (03/03/05)
  - Re: S4 + ZFC? Jim Spriggs (03/03/05)
  - Re: S4 + ZFC? Mike Carroll (03/03/05)
    - Re: S4 + ZFC? Jim Spriggs (03/03/05)
    - Re: S4 + ZFC? Mike Carroll (03/03/05)
Re: definition: co-moron clonebear_at_webtv.net (03/03/05)
- Re: definition: co-moron mcyberliver (03/03/05)
Re: Neil W Rickert, yet another moral imposter Stephen Harris (03/02/05)
- Re: Neil W Rickert, yet another moral imposter Stephen Harris (03/03/05)

sci.logicBy Thread

sci.logic
By Thread