Re: doubting successor
Helene.Boucher_at_wanadoo.fr
Date: 03/24/05
- Next message: Bhupinder Singh Anand: "Re: Why an inconsistent ZF may be desirable, and should be welcome."
- Previous message: H. J. Sander Bruggink: "Re: If-then in Logic vs Programming"
- In reply to: Torkel Franzen: "Re: doubting successor"
- Next in thread: Barb Knox: "Re: doubting successor"
- Reply: Barb Knox: "Re: doubting successor"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 24 Mar 2005 05:06:51 -0800
Torkel Franzen wrote:
> Well, the idea that people
> using or working in mathematics will ever find that setting aside the
> successor axiom is a good idea (for whatever reason) is just a pipe
> dream, such as might result from smoking some powerful weed.
Ah I didn't realize that we derive the expression "pipe dream" from the
metaphor of smoking a powerful weed. Interesting.
- Next message: Bhupinder Singh Anand: "Re: Why an inconsistent ZF may be desirable, and should be welcome."
- Previous message: H. J. Sander Bruggink: "Re: If-then in Logic vs Programming"
- In reply to: Torkel Franzen: "Re: doubting successor"
- Next in thread: Barb Knox: "Re: doubting successor"
- Reply: Barb Knox: "Re: doubting successor"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]