Re: What is wrong with this argument?
From: Denis Loubet (dloubet_at_io.com)
Date: 03/26/05
- Next message: jshsucks_at_yahoo.com: "Re: duality in physics, not tri-ality, implies that only Riemannian and Lobachevskian geometries exist and that Euclidean is not a geometry"
- Previous message: Doc Smartass: "Re: What is wrong with this argument?"
- Maybe in reply to: Woden: "Re: What is wrong with this argument?"
- Next in thread: grazer: "Re: What is wrong with this argument?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 17:08:40 -0600
"The great philosopher-criminologist" <bedford_park2000@yahoo.ca> wrote in
message news:1111874993.415822.226320@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> What is wrong with saying that God works in Mysterious ways?
Well, if it said to excuse the supposed actions of a god, then the one
saying it is stating that they don't actually care what the god they believe
in does, or what its motives are, they'll just worship it anyway.
It's a big denial of personal responsibility. It's like saying "I'll follow
that Hitler guy anywhere. I know he kills Jews, but I'm sure he has our best
interests at heart."
-- Denis Loubet dloubet@io.com http://www.io.com/~dloubet
- Next message: jshsucks_at_yahoo.com: "Re: duality in physics, not tri-ality, implies that only Riemannian and Lobachevskian geometries exist and that Euclidean is not a geometry"
- Previous message: Doc Smartass: "Re: What is wrong with this argument?"
- Maybe in reply to: Woden: "Re: What is wrong with this argument?"
- Next in thread: grazer: "Re: What is wrong with this argument?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|