Re: What is wrong with this argument?
From: David H. (davidhaapala_at_sbcglobal.fart.not.net)
Date: 03/27/05
- Next message: Malin: "Artificial Intelligence solved ?? Yeah sure,not exactly !!"
- Previous message: Chris Menzel: "Re: Why an inconsistent ZF may be desirable, and should be welcome."
- In reply to: graham: "Re: What is wrong with this argument?"
- Next in thread: Desertphile, American Patriot: "Re: What is wrong with this argument?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 15:20:59 GMT
"graham" <stratman@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:N2n1e.806710$8l.161565@pd7tw1no...
>
> "The great philosopher-criminologist" <bedford_park2000@yahoo.ca> wrote in
> message news:1111882637.238261.256340@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> L. Raymond wrote:
>>> On 26 Mar 2005 14:09:53 -0800, The great philosopher-criminologist
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > What is wrong with saying that God works in Mysterious ways?
>>>
>>> Well for starters your capitalization is all messed up...
>>
>> The computer's fault.
>>
>
> Since it works in mysterious ways, maybe you'd better start worshipping
> it!
>
Ha! Great!
The Great Philosopher walked dead straight into *that one!
My chuckle of the day.
David H. aa #2217
- Next message: Malin: "Artificial Intelligence solved ?? Yeah sure,not exactly !!"
- Previous message: Chris Menzel: "Re: Why an inconsistent ZF may be desirable, and should be welcome."
- In reply to: graham: "Re: What is wrong with this argument?"
- Next in thread: Desertphile, American Patriot: "Re: What is wrong with this argument?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]