Re: What is wrong with this argument?
From: Elroy Willis (elroywillis_at_swbell.net)
Date: 03/29/05
- Next message: Archimedes Plutonium: "Euclid never gave a indirect proof of Infinitude of Primes; his proof was direct"
- Previous message: Elroy Willis: "Re: What is wrong with this argument?"
- Maybe in reply to: Woden: "Re: What is wrong with this argument?"
- Next in thread: Sweet Ol' Bob: "Re: What is wrong with this argument?"
- Reply: Sweet Ol' Bob: "Re: What is wrong with this argument?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:29:00 GMT
The great philosopher-criminologist wrote in alt.atheism
> Elroy Willis wrote:
>> The great philosopher-criminologist wrote in alt.atheism
>>>> Also with the euthanasia debate flaring again due to the Terri
>>>> Schiavo case do you believe that it is god who determines whether
>>>> or not a person dies and the manner in which this death will take
>>>> place?
>>> Yes.
>> So all those people who died on 9/11 died because your god willed
>> their deaths? And the hundreds of thousands that died in the last
>> tsunami died because it was your god willed them to die?
> Planned it all from the beginning.
So you basically worship a mass murderer. How nice.
-- Elroy Willis www.elroysemporium.com
- Next message: Archimedes Plutonium: "Euclid never gave a indirect proof of Infinitude of Primes; his proof was direct"
- Previous message: Elroy Willis: "Re: What is wrong with this argument?"
- Maybe in reply to: Woden: "Re: What is wrong with this argument?"
- Next in thread: Sweet Ol' Bob: "Re: What is wrong with this argument?"
- Reply: Sweet Ol' Bob: "Re: What is wrong with this argument?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
