Re: Relation between sets and their elements

> Paul Holbach wrote:

> Can sets lose their elements and keep their identity as distinct
> entities, i.e. as entities distinct from the empty set?
> (I don't think so.)

What happened to the set of dinosaurs when the dinosaurs had become
extinct?

It became identical with the empty set, which cannot be identical with
its elements, since it has none.

#PH

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Relation between sets and their elements
    ... >> Paul Holbach wrote: ... i.e. as entities distinct from the empty set? ... > What happened to the set of dinosaurs when the dinosaurs had become ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Relation between sets and their elements
    ... For example, the set of dinosaurs does seem to have lost its elements, ... there had already been an empty set called "the set of dinosaurs" since ... ones that are contingently empty and ones that are necessarily empty. ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Relation between sets and their elements
    ... > For example, the set of dinosaurs does seem to have lost its elements, ... > there had already been an empty set called "the set of dinosaurs" since ... > ones that are contingently empty and ones that are necessarily empty. ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Relation between sets and their elements
    ... the set of all dinosaurs alive today is the empty set. ... in the Andromeda galaxy, the set of intelligent life forms in the ... Andromeda galaxy exists either as the empty set or as the set that has ... >> to lose all their members? ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Relation between sets and their elements
    ... >> Was there a contingently empty set called ... Your set of dinosaurs may be "all dinosaurs ... planets in our solar system in 2005. ...
    (sci.logic)