Re: Relation between sets and their elements
- From: "Nam Nguyen" <namducnguyen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 23:07:55 GMT
"Paul Holbach" <paulholbachSPAMBAN@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1114379967.686846.280650@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Paul Holbach wrote:
>
> > Can sets lose their elements and keep their identity as distinct
> > entities, i.e. as entities distinct from the empty set?
> > (I don't think so.)
But it also seems that mathematics is time invariant and therefore sets
can _not_ loose their elements.
>
> What happened to the set of dinosaurs when the dinosaurs had become
> extinct?
Accordingly, either we have a set of dinosaurs that once lived or an empty
to begin with; but not a set of dinosaurs that would one day walk out of
the set into oblivion, I'd think.
---Nam Nguyen
>
> It became identical with the empty set, which cannot be identical with
> its elements, since it has none.
>
> #PH
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Relation between sets and their elements
- From: Paul Holbach
- Re: Relation between sets and their elements
- References:
- Relation between sets and their elements
- From: Paul Holbach
- Re: Relation between sets and their elements
- From: Paul Holbach
- Relation between sets and their elements
- Prev by Date: Re: Relation between sets and their elements
- Next by Date: Re: Relation between sets and their elements
- Previous by thread: Re: Relation between sets and their elements
- Next by thread: Re: Relation between sets and their elements
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|