Re: What Logic Really Is
- From: "Peter_Smith" <ps218@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Apr 2005 14:22:51 -0700
C-B (old) "Isn't mathematics formal by definition?"
C-B (new) "I am not saying anything here about ["formal"] being true of
all of mathematics."
Good, so you now agree that the original way you put it was
unwarrentedly overgeneral -- which was indeed the point I was making,
and we are in happy concord! :-)
.
- References:
- Re: What Logic Really Is
- From: Robert Kolker
- Re: What Logic Really Is
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: What Logic Really Is
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: What Logic Really Is
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: What Logic Really Is
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: What Logic Really Is
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: What Logic Really Is
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: What Logic Really Is
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: What Logic Really Is
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: What Logic Really Is
- Prev by Date: Re: kinds of definitions
- Next by Date: Re: approaching a proof
- Previous by thread: Re: What Logic Really Is
- Next by thread: representation and replacement
- Index(es):