Re: refining the diag proof. defn of countable



> "HERC777" <herc777@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1114989373.892717.19310@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > It's not enough to define an antidiag as proof of
> > uncountable, there
> > are 2 possible reasons for a list to be
> > missing a specified element.

Tony wrote:
> You are right!

You are stupid.

.



Relevant Pages


Quantcast