Re: A Simple Non-Diagonalisable List
- From: "HERC777" <herc777@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 15 May 2005 00:11:17 -0700
H> AnEcAd1d2[ new & cew & d1eD & d2eD & (d1=/=d2)
> -> L[n,n]=d1
> & L[c,c]=d2
> & L[n,c]=d1
> & L[c,n]=d2
> ] ]
> to me that says, for all digits, L[n,n] = that digit.
G>Well, yeah, I was trying to paraphrase you,
>so of course I didn't get it right.
Surely you can check your own syntax?
An, Ad, L[n,n] = d ?
Herc
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A Simple Non-Diagonalisable List
- From: george
- Re: A Simple Non-Diagonalisable List
- References:
- Re: A Simple Non-Diagonalisable List
- From: george
- Re: A Simple Non-Diagonalisable List
- From: HERC777
- Re: A Simple Non-Diagonalisable List
- From: george
- Re: A Simple Non-Diagonalisable List
- Prev by Date: Re: A simple undiagonalisable list - ILLUSTRATED
- Next by Date: Universal logic modules vs NAND-like modules
- Previous by thread: Re: A Simple Non-Diagonalisable List
- Next by thread: Re: A Simple Non-Diagonalisable List
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|