Re: a question on infinite models
- From: "Bruce Samuels" <bsamuels@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 20:07:08 GMT
"Bruce Samuels" <bsamuels@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:c2Mje.27$XB2.77068@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Chris Menzel" <cmenzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:slrnd8sprd.uu.cmenzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> On Fri, 20 May 2005 15:32:00 GMT, Bruce Samuels <bsamuels@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> said:
>>> Can someone help me with this problem from Enderton chapter 2.6.8:
>>> Assume that phi is true in all infinite models of a theory T. Show that
>>> there is a finite mumber k such that phi is true in all models U of T
>>> for
>>> which |U| has k or more elements.
>>
>> Assume there is no such k -- formulate the denial carefully. You should
>> quickly see that it is inconsistent with an important corollary to the
>> completeness theorem.
>>
>
> Is there not also a proof that is a direct consequence of the
> Lowenheim-Skolem theorem?
>My apologies, I just learned that the Lowenheim_Skolem Theorem is
>considered a corallary of completeness.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: a question on infinite models
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: a question on infinite models
- References:
- a question on infinite models
- From: Bruce Samuels
- Re: a question on infinite models
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: a question on infinite models
- From: Bruce Samuels
- a question on infinite models
- Prev by Date: Re: a question on infinite models
- Next by Date: Re: when laypersons look smarter than math professors Re: a question for the anti-Cantorians
- Previous by thread: Re: a question on infinite models
- Next by thread: Re: a question on infinite models
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|