Re: a question on infinite models

On Sat, 21 May 2005 20:07:08 GMT, Bruce Samuels <bsamuels@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
> ...
> My apologies, I just learned that the Lowenheim_Skolem Theorem is
> considered a corallary of completeness.

True, but it's not the theorem I had in mind.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: What boat to buy?
    ... Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer ... Dennis (with apologies to Will S.) ... Prev by Date: ...
    (uk.rec.sailing)
  • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
    ... Therfore real line has void. ... Why there is no gaps in real line ... ruffled my mind. ... you also will understand what is meant by "gaps" and why completeness ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
    ... Therfore real line has void. ... Why there is no gaps in real line ... ruffled my mind. ... you also will understand what is meant by "gaps" and why completeness ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: SF: Back to theory
    ... My apologies if you took offense at that. ... in mind there. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Pics of new orleans
    ... >>>another newsgroup (hope they don't mind). ... Pics of Katrina as it ... >>>happened, by a N.O. resident. ... >>>Apologies if it's been here already.. ...
    (uk.rec.sheds)
Loading