Re: Here is a hard one, for me...
- From: "1st Semester Logic Student" <jzarwel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 May 2005 09:05:47 -0700
Hey! I know what you mean, I think. Here is what we came up with in
class:
The Sentences of SL:
1. Any sentence letter is a sentence of SL.
2. If P is a sentence of SL then ~P is a sentence of SL.
3. If P and Q are sentences of SL then (P & Q) is a sentence of SL.
4. If P & Q are sentences of SL then (P v Q) is a sentence of SL
5. If P and Q are sentences of SL then (P horseshoe Q) is a sentence of
SL.
6. If P and Q are sentences of SL then (P triplebar Q) is a sentence of
SL.
7. Nothing else is a sentence.
That is it! Is that what you meant? I realize that it would be
impossible for you to answer my original question without the above.
Sorry, I am VERY new to Logic.
Thanks!
.
- References:
- Here is a hard one, for me...
- From: 1st Semester Logic Student
- Re: Here is a hard one, for me...
- From: 1st Semester Logic Student
- Re: Here is a hard one, for me...
- From: William Elliot
- Here is a hard one, for me...
- Prev by Date: Re: when laypersons look smarter than math professors Re: a question for the anti-Cantorians
- Next by Date: Re: This seems easy...But...
- Previous by thread: Re: Here is a hard one, for me...
- Next by thread: Re: Here is a hard one, for me...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|