Re: The Consise Cantor Disproof

Who really thinks a number LIKE THIS 0.000101110111010100...
is just as likely to be randomly generated as a number like this
0.000000000000000.. ?
What bull***!

Look you morons, grade 10 advanced math class can follow the argument,
there is literally no need to define random or specify properties of
random generated numbers.

0.000000000000000.. does NOT OCCUR as output of a computer outputting
random digits. QED.

if you dedicataed all life on earth and all machinery to building the
biggest fastest computers possible, and you dedicated all of those
machines to outputting randomly generated digits untill heat death of
the Universe, the longest string of 0s you'll get is about 100. So
lets can the bull***! Look at the implied proof then complain.
You're killing the messenger boy for your excuses everyone can see
that.

Assume we have a list with the properties

PROPERTY 1/ there's oo 1s in the 1st digit position!
PROPERTY 2/ there's oo 0s in the 1st digit position!
PROPERTY 3/ there's oo 1s in the 2nd digit position!
PROPERTY 4/ there's oo 0s in the 2nd digit position!
....

I won't mention HOW we REALLY COULD generate such a list, because
nonsense idiots will complain.

Now, given some diagonal with oo 0s and oo 1s, BREAK IT DOWN INTO FACT
ATOMS!

DIAG = 0.0011101010..
<->
{
FACT 1/ there is a 0 in position 1 somewhere in the list
FACT 2/ there is a 0 in position 2 somewhere in the list
FACT 3/ there is a 1 in position 3 somewhere in the list
FACT 4/ there is a 1 in position 4 somewhere in the list
... }


What relationship exists between the axioms for the list and the facts
derived from the diagonal?

Herc

.