Re: Help in answering news story on refutation of fermat's last theorem
- From: Torkel Franzen <torkel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 May 2005 21:34:39 +0200
anzaurres1@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> However, if it isn't inconsistent with some other axioms in your axiom
> set, why would a statement like "0=1" be a false axiom? Only if (as you
> seem to say) we interpret the three symbols in "0=1" in the usual
> arithmitic way, as, say, applied to integers and not to rings of size
> one.
In speaking of arithmetical statements as true or false in
mathematics, we are of course presupposing their ordinary
interpretation unless explicitly indicating the contrary.
.
- References:
- Re: Help in answering news story on refutation of fermat's last theorem
- From: anzaurres1
- Re: Help in answering news story on refutation of fermat's last theorem
- From: Acme Diagnostics
- Re: Help in answering news story on refutation of fermat's last theorem
- From: anzaurres1
- Re: Help in answering news story on refutation of fermat's last theorem
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: Help in answering news story on refutation of fermat's last theorem
- From: anzaurres1
- Re: Help in answering news story on refutation of fermat's last theorem
- Prev by Date: Re: Help in answering news story on refutation of fermat's last theorem
- Next by Date: Re: I want to ask you 8<
- Previous by thread: Re: Help in answering news story on refutation of fermat's last theorem
- Next by thread: Re: Proof that the diagonal is useless, redundant, noise,
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|