Re: No one here is capable of working this out
- From: "george" <greeneg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 4 Jun 2005 06:46:00 -0700
I said:
Your problem is that you have never gotten around to
saying what it means for a finite TM program to represent
an infinitely wide real. You replied:
> I don't need
>
> 1/ a complete set of reals
> AND
> 2/ every real is fully populated in every digit
>
> to demonstrate completeness.
>
> True or False
*** you.
ANSWER THE QUESTION, bitch.
There is no way to talk about "populated"
until AFTER you say how a TM can represent a real.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: No one here is capable of working this out
- From: HERC777
- Re: No one here is capable of working this out
- References:
- Re: No one here is capable of working this out
- From: george
- Re: No one here is capable of working this out
- From: HERC777
- Re: No one here is capable of working this out
- From: george
- Re: No one here is capable of working this out
- From: HERC777
- Re: No one here is capable of working this out
- From: george
- Re: No one here is capable of working this out
- From: HERC777
- Re: No one here is capable of working this out
- Prev by Date: Re: Hello There?
- Next by Date: Re: A POLYNOMIAL COMPUTER GENERATED REAL NUMBER SET
- Previous by thread: Re: No one here is capable of working this out
- Next by thread: Re: No one here is capable of working this out
- Index(es):