Re: FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- From: "Tom" <tkorna@xxxxx>
- Date: 13 Jun 2005 04:27:52 -0700
Tom wrote:
[...]
> I see. Still, how do you suggest anyone digest the Church-Turing thesis
> without being solicited by a TRULY authoritative tutor with *vast*
> experience?
I am sorry. I forgot to answer my question. No, nothing can be done
about it since it cannot even be proved. :-( Thus, one cannot just sit
down and digest it. :-( It must be believed. :-) And I believe You. :-)
Thank You so much for writing.
Tom
.
- References:
- FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- From: Tom
- Re: FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- From: Jim Spriggs
- Re: FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- From: Tom
- Re: FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- From: Jim Spriggs
- Re: FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- From: Tom
- Re: FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- From: galathaea
- Re: FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- From: Keith Ramsay
- Re: FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- From: Tom
- Re: FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- From: Keith Ramsay
- Re: FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- From: Tom
- FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- Prev by Date: Re: FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- Next by Date: Re: FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- Previous by thread: Re: FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- Next by thread: Re: FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|