Re: FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- From: Torkel Franzen <torkel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 13 Jun 2005 18:05:05 +0200
"galathaea" <galathaea@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> he was confident
> like hilbert
> that the process of proof could comprehend all truth
What actual statement of Godel's do you have in mind here?
> but in his attempts to prove this assertion
When and where did he try to prove this?
Your various comments seem to be based on your personal fantasies.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- From: galathaea
- Re: FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- References:
- FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- From: Tom
- Re: FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- From: Jim Spriggs
- Re: FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- From: Tom
- Re: FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- From: Jim Spriggs
- Re: FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- From: Tom
- Re: FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- From: galathaea
- Re: FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- From: Tom
- FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- Prev by Date: Re: FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- Next by Date: Re: FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- Previous by thread: Re: FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- Next by thread: Re: FOL, ZFC, NGB and Prolog
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|