Re: free variables in FOL
- From: Jim Spriggs <jim.sprigs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 17:22:48 +0000 (UTC)
Ken Quirici wrote:
>
> How can free variables pop up at all in any sentential formulae?
I'm not sure what a sentential formula is, but one way to understand a
formula with free variables in it is to imagine that all the free
variables are bound by a prefix of universal quantifiers. So
F(x, y)
with x and y both free means one of these:
(all x)(all y) F(x, y)
(all y)(all x) F(x, y)
Since they are provably materially equivalent it doesn't matter which,
but for the sake of definiteness you could require that the variables in
the prefix are in alphabetical order.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: free variables in FOL
- From: Ken Quirici
- Re: free variables in FOL
- References:
- free variables in FOL
- From: Ken Quirici
- free variables in FOL
- Prev by Date: Re: Aristotelian syllogistic and monadic FOL
- Next by Date: Re: free variables in FOL
- Previous by thread: free variables in FOL
- Next by thread: Re: free variables in FOL
- Index(es):