Re: free variables in FOL
- From: William Elliot <marsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:23:46 -0700
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Ken Quirici wrote:
> Jim Spriggs wrote:
> >
> > Consider this rule
> >
> > from F(x) => G
> > deduce (Ax)F(x) => G
> >
(x)(F(x) -> G)
(x)F(x) -> (x)G
(x)G -> G
(x)F(x) -> G
> > Can you find a counter example?
>
No.
> Universe of discourse:
>
> set of integers I
>
> F(x): x is divisible by 5
>
> G: there are primes divisible by 5
>
> then clearly F(x) => G for x=5, but not for any other x in I.
>
So what? It's not a counteraxample
Since G
P -> G for any P
.
- References:
- free variables in FOL
- From: Ken Quirici
- Re: free variables in FOL
- From: Jim Spriggs
- Re: free variables in FOL
- From: Ken Quirici
- Re: free variables in FOL
- From: Jim Spriggs
- Re: free variables in FOL
- From: Ken Quirici
- free variables in FOL
- Prev by Date: Re: Aristotelian syllogistic and monadic FOL
- Next by Date: Re: Did we really hope to get away with The Gödelian Argument?
- Previous by thread: Re: free variables in FOL
- Next by thread: Re: free variables in FOL
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|