Re: Gödel's theorems in Wikipedia
- From: "(not a)\\/b" <al@xxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 08:09:08 GMT
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 08:02:47 GMT, "(not a)\\b" <al@xxx> wrote:
>On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 16:18:30 +0300, Aatu Koskensilta
><aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>I took the time to rewrite the three first sections of the rather sorry
>>Wikipedia entry on Gödel's incompleteness theorems
>>(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%F6del%27s_incompleteness_theorem). Any
>>corrections or suggestions would be appreciated.
>
>godel theorem is ***, it is false
>l'attuale 'mathematics' first order theory is ***
l'attuale teoria degli insiemi dei logici is ***
>Hilbert is right (ma non lo ha dimostrato matematicamente)
.
- References:
- Gödel's theorems in Wikipedia
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Gödel's theorems in Wikipedia
- From: (not a)\\b
- Gödel's theorems in Wikipedia
- Prev by Date: Re: Gödel's theorems in Wikipedia
- Next by Date: Re: Set Theory Exercise
- Previous by thread: Re: Gödel's theorems in Wikipedia
- Next by thread: "First example of a purely number-theoretic first order statement independent of PA"
- Index(es):