Re: Set Theory Exercise
- From: "Max Weiss" <mmweiss@xxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Jun 2005 11:07:25 -0700
William Elliot wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jun 2005, Max Weiss wrote:
>
> > Well, I was hoping to avoid controversy...
> >
> > Do you mean that you think that the argument is o.k.?
> >
> As you have removed all context not keeping or quoting anything from the
> post your replying to, it's not clear to whom you are replying or what you
> are talking about. Please don't remove context, it leads to gibberish.
>
Sorry about that! I was wondering whether your remark
> Thus you've show Exercise ==> AxC. So hurry up and do that exercise
indicated you thought correct my earlier
> Let x be a set, and let S = {x}. Then Pow(S)={{x},0}, so there is a
> choice function for S, namely {<{x},x>}. But then by the Exercise
> there's a choice function for union(S), i.e., for x
Cheers,
Max
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Set Theory Exercise
- From: William Elliot
- Set Theory Exercise
- References:
- Set Theory Exercise
- From: Max Weiss
- Re: Set Theory Exercise
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Set Theory Exercise
- From: Max Weiss
- Re: Set Theory Exercise
- From: William Elliot
- Set Theory Exercise
- Prev by Date: Re: Set Theory Exercise
- Next by Date: Set Theory Exercise
- Previous by thread: Re: Set Theory Exercise
- Next by thread: Set Theory Exercise
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|